AI Rate Professor

English

Linda Ferrari

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid if you need a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerMean DemeanorVery DifficultLow Student Satisfaction
  • The only review is strongly negative about the instructor's treatment of students.
  • The reported difficulty is very high, with little evidence of support or clarity.
  • There is not enough detail to judge grading policy beyond the low experience score.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

A B- with maximum difficulty suggests getting an A would likely require significant effort.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The course appears very difficult based on the maximum difficulty rating and negative tone.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The only student comment is strongly negative and .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

A B- in a , but evidence is thin.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The , though workload specifics are not described.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

The only review focuses on mean and .

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review gives .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single in-person review describes a harsh interpersonal experience and very high difficulty.

Main concern

Students may experience the class as unsupportive and unpleasant.

What students said

“i don't like her. she was mean and cruel.”
262

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format or policy.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“i don't like her. she was mean and cruel.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting limited evidence about teaching tone and difficulty. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“i don't like her. she was mean and cruel.”

⚠️ Course Difficulty

18/100

“i don't like her. she was mean and cruel.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • i don't like her. she was mean and cruel.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • i don't like her. she was mean and cruel.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one old, brief review with little course detail.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

2621 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values