AI Rate Professor

English

Brian Carter

ENGL125 · ENG3 · ENGENG · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless and tolerate unclear or distracting class sessions.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing explanationsFlexible deadlinesHeavy assignment pileupUnprofessional class timeMixed reviews
  • and inconsistent teaching quality.
  • Deadlines are flexible because .
  • The workload can pile up badly if students fall behind.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Flexible deadlines make passing manageable, but the work.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The course content sounds manageable, but difficulty ratings suggest.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty, and they emphasize clarity problems more than hard material.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews clearly mention flexible assignment dates, but they do not clearly prove the .

Only in-person reviews mention flexibility, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most detailed comments are hesitant or strongly negative because of and distracting class time.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Deadlines appear lenient, but there is .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Several comments warn that and can become stressful if delayed.

Format shift

The workload evidence comes only from in-person ENG3 reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Students describe unclear explanations and one very negative experience, despite some help when asked.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments focus on and do not clearly describe exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person comments are mostly negative, with and one severe complaint about unprofessional lectures.

Main concern

Students may need to self-manage a .

What students said

“ .”
ENGENG
“He doesn't clarify things too well sometimes,but .”
ENG3
“They are all due ,but there are a lot of assignments.”
ENG3

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or .

Exam policy unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Exam policy unclear
“They are all due ,but there are a lot of assignments.”
ENG3

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He doesn't clarify things too well sometimes,but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“He doesn't clarify things too well sometimes,but .”

📚 Workload Risk

30/100

“They are all due ,but there are a lot of assignments.”

⚠️ Student Experience

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He doesn't clarify things too well sometimes,but .
  • He doesn't clarify things too well...but .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • They are all due ,but there are a lot of assignments.
  • So you definately don't want to fall behind.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • Horrible Teacher!
  • Save yourself the stress stay away from anything he's a part of!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but one review has no comments and no recent evidence exists.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG32 reviews
ENGENG1 review
ENGL1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values