AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Rumita Laha

CHEM10 · 0 lifetime ratings

AI rating
3/100
RMP rating
0.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
0.0

The decision

unless you can handle poor communication and solve course problems independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNo CommunicationOnline IssuesLots of HomeworkGroup Assignment ProblemsAdministrative Escalation
  • The online review describes a severe communication failure across the entire course.
  • Students reportedly had unresolved issues with due dates, group work, and Canvas problems.
  • The class had to contact the department chair, which signals a major course management breakdown.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

The student earned a B, but the course sounds costly because poor communication and lots of .

The evidence comes only from one online review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course difficulty appears driven by poor organization, unresolved issues, and lots of .

The evidence comes only from one online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

The only evidence is online, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

The review strongly discourages the professor because communication was absent and the class had to escalate issues.

The recommendation evidence comes only from one online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, but unresolved due-date and assignment issues make the course feel harsh in practice.

Format shift

The .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The review directly tags lots of homework and describes multiple unresolved assignment issues.

Format shift

The workload evidence comes only from one online review.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

The review describes no communication from the professor despite repeated student outreach.

Format shift

The teaching evidence comes only from one online review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The review emphasizes due dates, group assignments, participation problems, and .

Format shift

The assessment evidence comes only from one online review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review describes no professor communication and unresolved course-management problems.

Main concern

Students had to escalate problems to the department chair.

What students said

“I never once received any communication from the professor despite reaching out multiple times”
CHEM-10
“Eventually, we as a class had to contact the department chair”
CHEM-10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the exam format, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I never once received any communication from the professor despite reaching out multiple times”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“I never once received any communication from the professor despite reaching out multiple times”

⚠️ Course Management

8/100

“Eventually, we as a class had to contact the department chair”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“lack of ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Communication

  • I never once received any communication from the professor despite reaching out multiple times
  • Eventually, we as a class had to contact the department chair

Theme 2

📚 About Course Issues

  • incorrect due dates
  • lack of
  • the Canvas hack

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

0

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, though it is recent and specific about communication failures.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM-101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values