AI Rate Professor

Education

Cheryl Johnson

EDUC10 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
7/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid this class unless , and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrict GraderUnclear FeedbackRigid DeadlinesExtra Credit AvailableUnaccommodating
  • Students and .
  • Missed deadlines appear unforgiving, with assignments not reopened.
  • can raise grades, but it does not offset the poor teaching experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades can be high because helps, but students describe harsh grading, unclear expectations, and punishing deadlines.

All evidence comes from online reviews, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course feels difficult because unclear requirements and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

, but deadline flexibility is very low because .

Online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students strongly discourage taking the class because , and communication feels dismissive.

The recommendation evidence is entirely from online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Every review calls her a though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is not the main complaint, but reading and .

Format shift

Only online workload evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students , and unaccommodating responses.

Format shift

Only online teaching evidence exists.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments focus on assignments, deadlines, feedback, and .

Format shift

Only online assessment evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are , and no flexibility on missed deadlines.

Main concern

Students and deadline policies are unforgiving.

What students said

“Easily the .”
EDUC-10
“The so wrong.”
EDUC-10
“ if you miss the due date”
EDUC-10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clear

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clear

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The so wrong.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“Don't bother emailing her for and dismissive.”

⚖️

8/100

“She is such a and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“But .”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • Easily the .
  • She is such a and .
  • and .

Theme 2

🕒 About Deadlines

  • If you miss a deadline the .
  • if you miss the due date, and she'll refuse to reopen them, no matter the excuse.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • and dismissive.
  • her responses are always vague and unaccommodating.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because three recent online reviews are detailed and highly consistent in their complaints.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

EDUC-103 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values