AI Rate Professor

Communication

Michael Love

COMMC1000 · COMS105 · 73 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
20.27%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid him unless you are highly independent, tolerant of disorganization, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProCondescending CommunicationDisorganized Course DesignHeavy Busy WorkUnclear InstructionsPolarizing Public Speaking Class
  • Most reviews describe a highly negative experience involving rude or , and poor organization.
  • Some students report easy grades or personal growth, but those positive reviews are outweighed by repeated severe warnings.
  • The course may not be intellectually hard, but the , and stressful communication make the experience costly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students still receive A-range grades, but the path , and inconsistent grading.

Both formats show high grades despite poor experiences, while and in-person reviews emphasize stressful classroom dynamics.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The communication content itself may be simple, but , and lengthy assignments make the course feel harder than it should.

Online students focus on convoluted Canvas directions, while and disruptive participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Participation appears important, and several reviews describe stressful required activities, class meetings, speeches, or discussions.

Online reviews mention meetings, discussion boards, and responsiveness problems, while and classroom pressure.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students warn against taking him because of rude communication, disorganization, excessive busy work, and .

Both formats are mostly negative, though each includes a small number of students who found him caring or helpful.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Grades can be high, but students frequently describe strict, inconsistent, delayed, or and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention strict feedback and , while and late assignment posting.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students repeatedly report long, pointless, mentally draining assignments, discussion boards, speeches, and excessive instructions.

Format shift

Online reviews are especially strong on long written directions, while and unrelated assignments.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

The dominant student experience is that , and ineffective despite a minority of positive caring-professor reviews.

Format shift

Both formats contain severe negative teaching comments, with .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus far more on discussion boards, speeches, written assignments, projects, participation, and .

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-centered, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are also mostly negative, focusing on rude classroom , and stressful participation.

Main concern

Students report humiliation, disorganization, and lengthy assignments that feel unrelated to communication learning.

What students said

“Goes out of his way to humiliate those who ask questions or make a simple mistake.”
COMM-C1000
“ ”
COMS-105
“The speeches were super low pressure”
COMS-105

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing long instructions, excessive busy , and discouraging interactions, with a few positive exceptions.

Main concern

Students report , and weak responsiveness.

What students said

“Discussion boards were over 2000 words”
COMM-C1000
“His "directions" are extremely convoluted and long.”
COMS-105
“I don't know why Mike has such bad reviews. I took him online over the winter and his class was great.”
COMS-105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy, proctoring setup, open-book rule, midterm format, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book exams, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you value .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“His lectures teach nothing of value.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

20/100

“ ”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“Assigned useless busy work with pages upon pages of convoluted instructions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is disrespectful and interrupts students/condescending.
  • Goes out of his way to humiliate those who ask questions or make a simple mistake.
  • I found Professor Love to be incredibly positive and very patient with students.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Organization

  • Discussion boards were over 2000 words
  • His "directions" are extremely convoluted and long.
  • Students had to so on the last day of the semester.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Grades And Value

  • As long as you do the assignments and participate you should get a good grade.
  • minor mistakes.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

73

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 recent reviews with many detailed, repeated complaints across both formats, though some reviews are emotionally extreme and a minority are positive.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 510
1 out of 548

Course coverage

COMS-10541 reviews
COMM-C10009 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

29

A+ 6 · A 16 · A- 7

B range

6

B+ 4 · B 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3