AI Rate Professor

Communication

Traci Wargo-Lehman

COM102 · COMMS101 · COMS7945 · COMM105 · COMMUNICATIONS · COMS105 · COM105 · COM100 · COMMS105 · 88 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a mostly easy and comfortable speech class, but expect personality-driven lectures and firm speech-day requirements.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyComfortable Speech ClassFunny LecturerClear Speech CriteriaSpeech-Day AttendanceMixed Professionalism
  • Most students find Wargo-Lehman funny, relaxed, and .
  • The class is usually easy if students meet speech requirements, deadlines, and .
  • A minority of reviews describe poor feedback, rude behavior, or unprofessional lectures, so fit matters.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The class is often an easy A when students follow speech criteria, meet deadlines, and do not miss speech days.

Both formats suggest good grade potential, but and grading criteria.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Speech anxiety can be challenging, but students repeatedly say she , and manageable.

In-person reviews strongly emphasize a comfortable speech environment, while online reviews emphasize organization and syllabus clarity.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, but speech days are consistently treated as mandatory and important.

Online evidence mentions mandatory class attendance, while in-person .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and clear communication class, but repeated complaints about rudeness and .

sharp negatives, while online reviews are split between excellent organization and poor structure.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Students often call grading reasonable and , but some report tough or .

Format shift

, while online evidence includes one tough-grader complaint and several positive structure comments.

Workload

Light

78/100

Workload is usually described as light, with speeches, essays, online work, and .

Format shift

Both formats support a light workload, though online reviews mention syllabus attention and individual work days.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Her teaching is usually praised as funny, welcoming, and clear, but several reviews describe rude, rushed, or unprofessional behavior.

Format shift

, while online evidence is mixed but includes strong praise for organization.

Assessment method

Balanced

54/100

Assessment is centered on speeches and related written work, with , and attendance components.

Format shift

, and attendance, while online reviews mention participation and syllabus-driven assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews mostly praise her as , and , though several students criticize grading and professionalism.

Main concern

Missing speech days can be costly, and some students dislike her blunt style.

What students said

“she made the class very enjoyable and welcoming.”
COMMS101
“ .”
COM105

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are mostly positive about organization, availability, and easy work, but one sharply negative review reports poor structure and rudeness.

Main concern

Online experience may depend heavily on whether her communication style works for you.

What students said

“Her online class is the best setup Ive seen out of 6 online classes.”
COMMS105
“offers no structure, no guided responses or formats.”
COM102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam comments suggest student-friendly tests in some sections, including untimed outside-class exams and a , but policies are not universal.

Untimed MidtermUntimed FinalDone Outside ClassTake-Home FinalEasy Midterm

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and an older take-home final, making exams appear low-pressure when used.

Untimed MidtermUntimed FinalDone Outside ClassTake-Home Final
“There is a midterm and final but they are both untimed and done outside of class”
COM105
“ , and a .”
COMMS105

Online

Online reviews do not clearly .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I hate public speaking but she made the class very enjoyable and welcoming.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and concerns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She creates a comfortable environment.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“If you need this class the !”

⚖️

68/100

“As long as you follow the criteria for the speeches then you're chilling.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she made the class very enjoyable and welcoming.
  • She is so hilarious and so laid back, I loved it!
  • Her lectures are straight forward and so .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • this was a relatively easy class and super enjoyable
  • As long as you follow her instructions and her class.
  • Put in the work, don't miss speeches, rehearse your speeches ahead of time and you'll easily get an A.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • .
  • .
  • Definitely a professor I would not take again for any class she lectures

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

88

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews cover a long time span, many give concrete details, and the main positives and concerns repeat clearly.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 560
4 out of 521
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

COMS10523 reviews
COM10512 reviews
COMM1054 reviews
COMMS1014 reviews
COMMS1053 reviews
Show 4 more courses
COM1001 review
COM1021 review
COMMUNICATIONS1 review
COMS79451 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 2 · A 16 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1