AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Jessica Schulman

FCS21 · 10159SU20M · NUTR11086 · HLHSC150 · HLHSCI150 · NUTRITION021 · HLHSCI140 · HLHSCI149 · NUTRITION21 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
93.55%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take Schulman if you want a and strong A potential.

Best fit · Easy A HunterSupportive ProfessorClear AssignmentsGenerous GradingPractical Health ContentManageable Workload
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Schulman as , and practical.
  • The class is usually easy to manage and grade-friendly if students follow instructions and stay on schedule.
  • Online reviews are especially strong, while a small number of .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

93/100

A grades are very common because instructions and appear in reviews, and assignments are manageable.

Online evidence strongly supports easy A potential, while but includes less volume and one organization complaint.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

The material is practical and easy to understand, though some sections include dense content, readings, writing, or discussions.

Online reviews call the course organized and easy to navigate, while but sometimes mention long lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

Students should stay on schedule and show up when applicable, but reviews .

Online reviews focus on deadlines and pacing, while and participation as helpful.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students recommend her because , and makes useful health topics accessible.

Online recommendations are especially consistent, while dissent about organization.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

91/100

Reviews cite generous grading, easy quizzes, , late work acceptance, clear rubrics, and many A grades.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the clearest grading leniency evidence, while and .

Workload

Light

82/100

Most students call the workload easy or manageable, though , and weekly assignments.

Format shift

Online workload is usually organized and manageable but can include many discussions, while projects.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe her as , and strong at giving useful feedback.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize organization and feedback, while and practical discussion.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grades appear to rely more on quizzes, discussions, writing, case studies, projects, and presentations than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online sections emphasize quizzes, discussions, papers, and projects, while , and a final presentation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and practical teaching, but one review flags organization and long lectures.

Main concern

A few in-person students may find lectures long or .

What students said

“Its a super easy-going class with .”
HLHSCI149
“ and it was typically a quiz and then sometimes .”
HLHSCI150
“ and looses track of time.”
HLHSCI150

Remote format

Online

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are highly positive, describing clear instructions, accessible materials, generous grading, , and manageable assignments.

Main concern

Some online sections , so procrastination can hurt.

What students said

“they are honestly graded pretty generously.”
HLHSCI140
“Very easy teacher! The course work was a breeze and easy as long as you put minimum effort.”
HLHSC150
“If you follow instructions and stay on schedule, you can do well.”
NUTRITION021

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment appears student-friendly because reviews mention easy , and no clear strict proctoring evidence.

Easy QuizzesTwo Quiz AttemptsNo Written Exams EvidenceFinal Presentation EvidenceNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews include one section with no written exams and a or assignments.

No Written Exams EvidenceFinal PresentationWeekly Quiz EvidenceAssignments
“ .”
HLHSCI149
“ and it was typically a quiz”
HLHSCI150
“You have to do your work and show up”
HLHSCI150

Online

Online reviews mention easy quizzes, two quiz attempts, case studies, projects, papers, and evidence.

Easy QuizzesTwo Quiz AttemptsCase StudiesProject-Based WorkNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“she makes the quizzes easy and fair.”
HLHSC150
“2 chances to take a quiz.”
NUTRITION21
“the because ”
HLHSCI140

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. Schulman is hands down one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment style. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“You can tell she is passionate about what she teaches.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ if you're planning on taking Nutrition”

⚖️

91/100

“they are honestly graded pretty generously.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very supportive and knowledgeable professor.
  • She makes it easy to learn the material for nutrition.
  • She brings the material to life AND uses the textbook.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Very easy teacher! The course work was a breeze and easy as long as you put minimum effort.
  • If you follow instructions and stay on schedule, you can do well.
  • If you actually put forth effort there's no reason why you shouldn't be able to pass.

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload And Assessments

  • She does do a lot of discussion assignments so make sure to stay on track with that
  • and it was typically a quiz
  • Its a super easy-going class with .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 31 reviews include recent and older , and very consistent positive patterns.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HLHSC1507 reviews
HLHSCI1507 reviews
NUTRITION0216 reviews
HLHSCI1403 reviews
NUTR110863 reviews
Show 4 more courses
NUTRITION212 reviews
10159SU20M1 review
FCS211 review
HLHSCI1491 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

25

A+ 6 · A 18 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2