AI Rate Professor

English

Adam Kaiserman

HUM150 · ENGL101H · ENGL261 · ENGL103 · HUM100 · ENG110 · ENG200 · ENG101 · ENGL110 · ENG102H · ENG103 · ENGL260 · 107 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
45.05%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

unless you specifically want a demanding, highly structured writing class and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerOverwhelming workloadHarsh essay gradingHeavy readingStrict structureHelpful for serious writers
  • Most negative reviews focus , and stress far beyond a typical English class.
  • Positive reviews say he is structured, passionate, and useful for students who want serious writing improvement.
  • Online reviews , and rigid course controls.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

27/100

A good grade is possible, but students repeatedly say it requires heavy , and intense effort.

Both formats are hard for grades, with online reviews adding stricter monitoring and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The content and structure are demanding because of , and rigid assignment rules.

Online students emphasize compressed workload and proctoring, while and daily work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Reviews show low flexibility through , and tight assignment expectations.

Online reviews mention mandatory Zoom activity and proctored work, while and prepared readings.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

because the workload and , though serious writers sometimes value the challenge.

, but online reviews are especially severe about surveillance and workload.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call him a harsh or expectations.

Format shift

Online and comments especially focused on essay format and creativity limits.

Workload

Overwhelming

8/100

The dominant , and daily assignments.

Format shift

Online short-session courses are described as crammed and stressful, while other classes combined.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

He can be structured and helpful for motivated writers, but many students describe the experience as stressful, rigid, and unsupportive.

Format shift

Positive online reviews value organization and feedback, while negative reviews in both formats dominate the overall teaching experience.

Assessment method

Balanced

46/100

Assessment includes , and participation rather than one single mode.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, discussions, papers, and proctoring, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and often negative, though some students praise his clarity, care, and engaging material.

Main concern

Students repeatedly report , and little flexibility.

What students said

“There have been times where I have needed to stay up until 4 ”
ENG102H
“This course was harder than all of my others combined.”
ENGL101H
“Dr. Kaiserman is such an inspirational professor.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews describe a , and some serious proctoring or cheating-suspicion concerns.

Main concern

The online format can feel rigid, stressful, and closely monitored.

What students said

“This professor is very disrespectful towards the student's time.”
ENGL261
“He proctors EVERYTHING.”
ENGL260
“Professor Kaiserman's class isn't the easiest, but it'll help you to improve your writing!”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam and , with proctoring, identity checks, and monitored writing mentioned directly.

Strict ProctoringChrome Device MonitoringID Photo ChecksQuizzes Without NotesProctored Writing

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quiz pressure, but do not clearly prove open-book rules or specific exam format.

Strict ProctoringLecture QuizzesReading Quizzes
“The professor is a nice person but and proctors everything.”
ENG102H
“Pay attention in lectures for quizzes.”
ENG101
“ and bases the answers off his opinion.”
ENG110

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention strict proctoring, , and mandatory viewing activity.

Strict ProctoringChrome Device MonitoringID Photo ChecksQuizzes Without NotesMandatory Zoom Viewing
“He proctors EVERYTHING.”
ENGL260
“watches you while because he is paranoid that you are cheating!”
ENGL261
“you can't even have notes with the quiz.”
ENGL260

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This course was harder than all of my others combined.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Pressure

8/100

“There have been times where I have needed to stay up until 4 ”

⚖️

18/100

“He wants everything by his way or its wrong.”

🎯 Teaching Tradeoff

38/100

“Professor Kaiserman's class is by no means easy, but if you want to challenge yourself and improve your writing, his class is for you.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • and .
  • This course was harder than all of my others combined.
  • He has a lot of expectations and they are doable if you put in the time daily.

Theme 2

⚖️ And Rules

  • He is very specific and strict, he allows no room for creativity in writing.
  • , and contract grading allows essays to be guaranteed a certain percent if you follow all requirements.
  • He wants everything by his way or its wrong.

Theme 3

🧠 About Learning Value

  • His class will make you a better writer!
  • The material he teaches is engaging.
  • If you are an .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

107

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews split evenly across online and and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 536
4 out of 520
3 out of 511
2 out of 510
1 out of 531

Course coverage

ENGL26012 reviews
ENG1016 reviews
ENG1106 reviews
ENGL2616 reviews
ENG1034 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENGL1104 reviews
Eng2003 reviews
HUM1003 reviews
ENG102H2 reviews
ENGL101H2 reviews
ENGL1031 review
HUM1501 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

12

B+ 3 · B 5 · B- 4

C range

4

C+ 3 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

20

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 13 · Rather not say 1