AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Alvard Adamyan

MATH211X · MATH103 · MATH60 · 060EA · MATH060 · MATH140 · MATH130 · MATH075 · MATH104 · 45 lifetime ratings

AI rating
57/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
43.48%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take her if you value a caring professor and extra support, but if .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring but inconsistentExtra creditTest heavyConfusing lecturesHelpful for some students
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who find her caring and helpful and .
  • , review sheets, partial credit, and free materials can help grades, but .
  • Recent reviews are more positive, especially for lower-level and support-oriented math courses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

, partial credit, review sheets, and some easy-course reports help, but many students say and self-study.

Online evidence includes an easy A claim for Math 075, while hard Math 103 exams.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The math content is sometimes made simple with support, but , rushed pacing, and .

Online lower-level math looks easier, while and instructor clarity.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but participation matters and students often say lectures, projects, or .

Online reviews mention live Zoom and participation, while but is not clearly proven mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation depends heavily on course and learning style because students either praise her care or strongly criticize her clarity and exams.

Online reviews lean more positive overall, while levels.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

She often gives , partial credit, and review sheets, but tests and as tough or inconsistent.

Format shift

Both formats mention , but in-person Math 103 reviews report harsher exam and .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and multiple exams, with some students calling it manageable and others calling it heavy.

Format shift

Online reviews mention lots of homework and several exams, while in-person workload complaints are concentrated in tougher courses.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

She is often described as caring and responsive, but many students report , and .

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mixed but somewhat steadier, while and poor clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

Students repeatedly mention multiple exams, finals, , and some projects.

Format shift

Both formats include exam-heavy evidence, with online reviews explicitly mentioning five exams and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with many recent students praising her care and while older Math 103 reviews criticize and hard exams.

Main concern

Lecture clarity and test alignment vary heavily by course and semester.

What students said

“I hated math most of my life but professor Adamyan made it enjoyable because she goes through every step.”
MATH104
“She will confuse you in lectures and .”
MATH103
“Always gave partial credit and a lot of as well.”
MATH104

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed but lean positive, with praise for flexibility and and communication issues.

Main concern

, and one online review reports poor communication.

What students said

“Easy A if you do the work.”
MATH075
“However, her tests were painful, some material weren't covered in the study guide and were worded strangely.”
MATH140
“There is no communication whatsoever.”
MATH103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent and sometimes difficult, but review sheets, partial credit, and make the structure more standard than strictly punitive.

Multiple ExamsCumulative FinalTest HeavyStudy GuidesPartial Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

44/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention test-heavy grading, study guides, partial credit, and , but .

Test HeavyStudy GuidesPartial CreditHard Exams
“Grade is based on 15% HW, 60% Exams (5), and 25% Final.”
MATH103
“Always gave partial credit and a lot of as well.”
MATH104
“ .”
MATH103

Online

and painful tests, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Five ExamsCumulative FinalPainful TestsExtra Credit
“She has 5 exams in .”
MATH103
“However, her tests were painful, some material weren't covered in the study guide and were worded strangely.”
MATH140

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 46 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course variation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“ but a little all over the place.”

📈 Grade Support

62/100

“Always gave partial credit and a lot of as well.”

🧮

44/100

“Grade is based on 15% HW, 60% Exams (5), and 25% Final.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support

  • and .
  • and and office hours.
  • Textbook and materials are all free online and she provides links to them.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Clarity

  • , but did not know how to teach her own class.
  • She made everything easy and simple, and she's really easy to talk to.
  • so I studied off my math070 notes from my last prof and went to TLC.

Theme 3

📈 About Exams and Grades

  • Before an exam she gives a review paper and that .
  • My test average was usually a 60-70% and I am usually a high 80% in other maths so that was a .
  • The class average on tests was always low 60's/high 50's.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

46

Recent reviews read by the AI

45

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-six reviews across many years, courses, and formats give broad evidence, though course-level variation is large.

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 59
1 out of 513

Course coverage

MATH10318 reviews
MATH1048 reviews
MATH0755 reviews
MATH1305 reviews
MATH0603 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH1403 reviews
MATH602 reviews
060EA1 review
MATH211X1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

37 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 2 · A 12 · A- 3

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 4

C range

8

C 7 · C- 1

D range

2

D 2

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2