AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kelly Aceves

MATH212 · MATH103 · MATH211 · MATH070 · MATH104 · 94 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
36.99%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you are strong in math, can self-study heavily, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy homeworkTest heavySelf-teaching riskKind but harsh
  • Many students describe very hard exams, little partial credit, no rounding, and .
  • The and long reviews, and students often say tests do not match preparation well.
  • Some strong math students praise her clarity and kindness, but the overall experience is risky for students who need support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

An A appears very hard because students cite strict grading, little or no partial credit, no , and .

Both formats are hard for grades, while online students more often add that they must teach themselves.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The content is already difficult math and , and exams make it feel even harder.

In-person and online reviews both describe difficult content, with online evidence showing extra difficulty from video-based learning.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance is described as required or important in several reviews, and .

, while online evidence does not clearly establish attendance flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students warn against taking her because the , and self-teaching burden outweigh her kindness for many learners.

Online reviews are especially negative, while supporters.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Reviews repeatedly mention tough grading, little partial credit, no rounding, no , and .

Format shift

Both formats support harsh grading, with online .

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Students often describe weekly homework, long reviews, daily work, and heavy study demands that .

Format shift

In-person and online , while hybrid and online sections sound especially time-consuming.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

She is often described as kind and , but many students say and that lectures do not prepare them well.

Format shift

, while online reviews lean more negative about learning from videos.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades are dominated by quizzes, midterms, finals, and but often not enough to offset exam performance.

Format shift

Both formats rely heavily on tests, and students in both mention exams as the main grade risk.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a highly demanding class with , and mixed teaching quality, though some students praise her care and clarity.

Main concern

, and exams that feel harder than the preparation.

What students said

“There are tons of .”
MATH104
“Those questions I did got no partial, though my concept/technique was right.”
MATH212
“75% of the class failed the first 2 exams and she blamed it on us.”
MATH104

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, describing , and poor fit for difficult math courses.

Main concern

Online students often say the videos and remote structure are not enough to learn the material.

What students said

“It is extremely difficult to grasp the concepts solely by the videos that we have to watch”
MATH104
“Never again 90% of the class dropped out.”
MATH104
“You have to be ready to teach yourself the material and there is a lot of homework.”
MATH104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam style is strict because students repeatedly , and little grade flexibility.

Hard ExamsNo Partial CreditNo RoundingNo Extra CreditNo Cheat Sheets Or Calculators

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe hard exam grading, multiple-choice tests with little room for error, and some sections with no cheat sheets or calculators.

Hard ExamsNo Partial CreditMultiple Choice TestsNo Cheat Sheets Or Calculators
“most of her exams are 10 question mcq (not much room for mistakes)”
MATH212
“she does not give partial credit so if you make one mistake that's it”
MATH104
“there are no cheat sheets or calulators.”
MATH104

Online

Online reviews clearly describe hard exams, no rounding, no , and self-teaching, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Hard ExamsNo RoundingNo Extra CreditNo Partial Credit
“She doesn't round up, gives no extracredit, or .”
MATH104
“she doesn't offer any partial credit and she also doesn't round up grades.”
MATH212
“ and try not to panic.”
MATH212

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching consistency. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She's nice, but if you're .”

⚖️

12/100

“Those questions I did got no partial, though my concept/technique was right.”

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“60-120 homework problems per week.”

Theme 1

📈 About Exams And Grades

  • .
  • Nobody was above a 75%.
  • No . 15% is Homework, and the rest is the test.
  • mistake without getting the whole question wrong.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • There are tons of .
  • The so much harder than the actual lessons.
  • 4 homework assignments per week, each has 150+ problems.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a nice person but her class is ruthless.
  • Lectures are useless overall and you are better off just teaching yourself the material.
  • and expectations and doesn't make you feel inferior for asking questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

94

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 detailed reviews across formats and , and high drop rates.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 516
3 out of 58
2 out of 518
1 out of 534

Course coverage

MATH10428 reviews
MATH21216 reviews
MATH0703 reviews
MATH2112 reviews
MATH1031 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

49 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 1 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 2 · B 6

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 2

D range

4

D+ 1 · D 3

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

20

Drop/Withdrawal 11 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 6