AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Karen Lewers

MATH140 · MATH075 · MATH211 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
65.38%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

She is a reasonable pick for statistics or structured students, but calculus students should be cautious about workload and teaching clarity.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and flexibleLots of homeworkGroup workMixed lecture clarityTest-heavy in some sections
  • Recent statistics reviews are often positive, citing clear , and .
  • Calculus and some online reviews are much more negative, with complaints , and .
  • The course can be grade-friendly for organized students, but the experience depends heavily on course and format.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

An A is realistic for organized students because , and , though some sections are much stricter.

, while online evidence is split and includes harsh calculus sections.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Statistics content is often described as , and manageable, but calculus reviews describe and harder exams.

In-person Math 140 reviews make the course sound easier, while online calculus-related reviews lower confidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

68/100

Reviews suggest participation matters, but the strongest evidence is flexibility with late .

In-person reviews mention pacing and participation more, while and homework.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and flexibility, but negative calculus and online reviews make the recommendation course-dependent.

, while online reviews are sharply mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Many , and , but some online or calculus reviews call grading strict.

Format shift

In-person sections show stronger leniency, while .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

as heavy, but flexibility, in-class time, and early reduce the pressure for organized students.

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

, and supportive, but a significant minority report lecture mistakes and .

Format shift

In-person Math 140 reviews are mostly positive, while online reviews show more severe teaching concerns.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment mixes homework, projects, quizzes, tests, and in , though some students report .

Format shift

In-person statistics sections sound balanced, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive for Math 140 and statistics, praising flexibility, feedback, group work, and .

Main concern

Some students still report lecture mistakes, lots of , and confusion.

What students said

“Teacher is easy going and flexible with late work and .”
Math140
“ and goes through each question missed on quizzes and tests and gives opportunities to earn points back.”
Math140
“She's always second guessing herself like she doesn't understand the material and hard to understand.”
MATH211

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split between clear, supportive sections and harsh complaints , and .

Main concern

Online calculus-related reviews warn that students may need to teach themselves and .

What students said

“ and lots of resources for additional help.”
MATH211
“Was awful for calculus. 85% of the grade was based on tests that she refused to provide proper study guides for.”
Math140
“I will say this professor is friendly. But she does not teach well you have to teach the material yourself.”
Math140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and notes in some sections but test-heavy grading and poor study guides in others.

Test RetakesPoints Back OpportunitiesNotes Allowed In Some SectionsFormula Support In Some QuizzesTest-Heavy In Some Sections

Assessment risk

Varies

61/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

some quizzes and the final, and formulas on quizzes in some older sections.

Test RetakesPoints Back OpportunitiesNotes Allowed On Some QuizzesNotes Allowed On FinalFormula Support
“flexible with late work and .”
Math140
“goes through each question missed on quizzes and tests and .”
Math140
“We were allowed to use notes on some quizzes (one index card) and the sheet).”
MATH075

Online

Online reviews mention four exams, strict showing-work rules, and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Four Exams Including FinalStrict Showing Work RulesTest-Heavy Sections
“There are 4 exams including the final and 1 easy project called ANOVA.”
Math140
“85% of the grade was based on tests that she refused to provide proper study guides for.”
Math140
“make and !”
Math140

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Teacher is easy going and flexible with late work and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in flexibility, teaching clarity, workload, and course-by-course variation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ .”

⚖️

72/100

“Lots of homework but lots of opportunities to get it done and she takes late work.”

📚 Workload Balance

45/100

“It's a lot of homework, but you get when you do it early.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really easy to talk to and very supportive as a teacher.
  • .
  • she makes tons of mistakes during lectures and and does not work with her students well.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Flexibility

  • Good teacher with .
  • and goes through each question missed on quizzes and tests and gives opportunities to earn points back.
  • She allows late work but if .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload And Tests

  • Lots of homework but lots of opportunities to get it done and she takes late work.
  • Study Guides over 100 questions.
  • 85% of the grade was based on tests that she refused to provide proper study guides for.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 26 reviews across recent years give detailed evidence, though course mix creates real variation.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

Math14019 reviews
MATH2115 reviews
MATH0752 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

16

A 12 · A- 4

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 2