AI Rate Professor

Physical Ed

Lisa Hooper

HEALT8269 · KPETHLSC · HLSCI100 · KPET200 · PHYSE138 · HSCI100 · BEGVBALL · KPEA · PHYS101 · KPEA107 · HEALT100 · HLH100 · HLTH100 · HEALTH100 · HLHSCI100 · PHYSED101 · BEGVOLLEYBALL · 61 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
78.57%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you can handle a direct coach-style instructor and are willing to follow instructions closely.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear grading when expectations are followedEngaging coach-style teachingTough discussion and test gradingParticipation mattersMixed online experience
  • Most students describe her in-person classes as engaging, structured, and worthwhile.
  • Grades are often manageable, but , and detailed expectations can feel strict.
  • Online reviews are more mixed, with , and grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

A good grade is realistic with participation, completed assignments, and , but full credit is not automatic.

In-person evidence supports fair effort with participation, while and communication risk.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Many PE and health courses are described as simple or straightforward, but health and .

In-person classes often feel manageable and hands-on, while online classes are .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

because of participation, labs, quizzes, or reviewed graded work, though at least one older review .

In-person reviews repeatedly mention attendance and participation, while online evidence includes .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend her for clear, energetic teaching, but the online and .

In-person reviews are strongly more positive, while online and frustrating experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

, but students often call her tough on discussions, tests, and detailed answers.

Format shift

but understandable for many students, while online grading has and unclear expectations.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is usually manageable, but , and projects can add up in some sections.

Format shift

and , while in-person workload ranges from light PE classes to heavier health and kinesiology classes.

Teaching experience

Good

79/100

Students often describe her as knowledgeable, engaging, and hands-on, though some older online-style health reviews report poor communication.

Format shift

, where communication and organization are more uneven.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear to come from a mix of , and assignments.

Format shift

, and participation, while online sections emphasize discussions, quizzes, projects, and written work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are generally positive, especially for coaching, lectures, and hands-on learning, though and .

Main concern

Students who miss class or expect easy full credit may struggle with , and participation.

What students said

“Great professor from beginning to end.”
KPET200
“I actually started to love volleyball after this class.”
BEGVOLLEYBALL
“She is a and lectures throughout the whole class time.”
KPET200

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with praise for clear short-term classes but , and discussions.

Main concern

Online students , and strict grading expectations.

What students said

“Online quizzes can be taken an unlimited amount of times, but the .”
KPET200
“Professor and answers .”
HEALT100
“It cost me an A in the class.”
15131

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show standard-to-demanding exams and quizzes, but they do not clearly prove strict proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book exams.

Timed FinalQuizzesTestsDiscussion GradingFinal Project

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention quizzes, tests, and timed finals, with difficulty varying by course, but .

QuizzesTimed FinalTestsFinal Project
“ .”
KPET200
“ . but easy”
KPET200
“Be prepared to study for the .”
HEALT100

Online

Online reviews mention unlimited quizzes and exams or finals, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Unlimited Online QuizzesDiscussion GradingExams Mentioned
“Online quizzes can be taken an unlimited amount of times, but the .”
KPET200
“*EVERYTHING on the same discussions.”
KPET200

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great professor from beginning to end.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

79/100

“Gives great lectures and ”

⚖️

52/100

“She is a and lectures throughout the whole class time.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“Would recommend 10/10.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was very hands on with the entire class.
  • Overall lectures were to the point and super detailed.
  • She knows the ins and outs of the sport.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • She hardly gave full credit for .
  • .

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • Nice teacher, easy work but political about certain topics.
  • Online quizzes can be taken an unlimited amount of times, but the .
  • Does not answer emails quickly or at all.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

61

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across many years and courses, with consistent patterns around engaging teaching, participation, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 534
4 out of 510
3 out of 58
2 out of 57
1 out of 53

Course coverage

KPET20013 reviews
KPEA1077 reviews
HLTH1005 reviews
BEGVOLLEYBALL3 reviews
HEALT1003 reviews
Show 13 more courses
HLHSCI1003 reviews
HLSCI1003 reviews
HEALTH1002 reviews
HLH1002 reviews
151311 review
BEGVBALL1 review
HEALT82691 review
HSCI1001 review
KPEA1 review
KPETHLSC1 review
PHYS1011 review
PHYSE1381 review
PHYSED1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1