Ruzanna Baytaryan

MATH · MATH212 · CALC211 · MATH213 · MATH211 · MATH058 · CALC212 · MATH104 · 280 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 40/100
RMP rating: 3.5/5
Take again: 42.96%
Difficulty: 3.7

The decision

if you are strong in math, can self-study heavily, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery test-heavyHarsh gradingPolarizing teachingCaring but demandingHigh self-study load

Reviews are sharply split, with some students praising her care and clarity while and .
Getting an A usually requires heavy independent study, strong math preparation, and strong test performance.
In-person reviews are especially polarized, while online reviews consistently warn , and self-teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible for prepared students, but most comments say it , and independent work.

Online reviews describe hard tests and self-study, while in-person reviews , and exam-heavy grade weight.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The calculus and math content is difficult, fast-paced, and often tested at a level students say exceeds lecture examples.

Both formats are challenging, but online students more often cite lectures as and .

Is attendance flexible?

Depends

43/100

, but many others strongly warn against taking her because of harsh exams and grading.

Online recommendations are mixed, while praise and severe avoid warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Grading is strict because many students describe tough grading, , and .

Format shift

, while in-person reviews include stronger claims about no partial credit, no curves, and .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

The workload is heavy because students report lots of , and high pressure before exams.

Format shift

Online sections require significant self-study, while in-person sections often require 10 or .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is polarizing, with some students praising clear notes and care while many describe and .

Format shift

Online teaching gets praise for materials from some students but criticism for robotic or long lectures, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Assessment is heavily exam-centered, with and homework has limited weight.

Format shift

Both formats are test-heavy, with as 70% or 80% from exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with strong praise for caring support and partial credit but many , and high withdrawal risk.

Main concern

The and many students report failing, dropping, or feeling unsupported.

What students said

“80% of , and its expected of you to study for 10+ hours a week.”
CALC211

“ , but doable if you study.”
MATH212

“over half my class dropped after the first test.”
MATH211

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed but lean difficult, with repeated concerns , and heavy self-study despite some praise for and support.

Main concern

The main and lectures that some students find .

What students said

“ and HW has not that much of an effect on your grade.”
CALC211

“Spent 14+ hours studying each test just for her to put the most abnormal problems.”
MATH212

“ , and she provides review problems, as well as the exact structure of the test beforehand”
MATH213

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are the main risk because students repeatedly describe them as hard, heavily weighted, and strictly graded.

Test HeavyHard ExamsScreen Recording MentionedNo Clear Webcam RequirementLimited Curve Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as hard, heavily weighted, and sometimes lacking curve or partial credit, but do not clearly prove closed-book or .

Hard Exams70 Percent Test Weight Mentioned80 Percent Test Weight MentionedNo Extra Credit Or Curve Mentioned

“She genuinely is so unrealistic when it comes to tests (70% of your grade btw)”
MATH211

“80% of ”
CALC211

“NO and ZERO grade curving.”
CALC211

Online

Online reviews mention screen recording in one review and hard tests, but reviews do not clearly .

Hard ExamsScreen Recording MentionedNo Clear Webcam RequirementTest Reviews

“ .”
MATH212

“you do ”
CALC211

“no face needed to be shown”
CALC211

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Only way to pass is WORK”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and polarized teaching experience. Credibility rating: High.

🧮 Course Difficulty

24/100

“This class is extremely difficult to pass.”

⚖️

25/100

“She grades really harshly and does not provide a lot of support.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ , and engaging, making difficult concepts easy to understand.”

Theme 1

📝

and HW has not that much of an effect on your grade.
, but doable if you study.
NO and ZERO grade curving.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

Expect , and I mean hours to get good scores on the dependent on them.
Only way to pass is WORK
be ready to read the lecture notes as most of the .

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

The , and made even difficult topics easy to understand.
Lectures can be hard to understand and really unengaging.
She is a very caring person and , and anywhere else.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

280

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is strong because 50 recent reviews cover both formats and show repeated, detailed patterns, though suspected fake-review claims make sentiment unusually polarized.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5130

4 out of 538

3 out of 536

2 out of 528

1 out of 548

Course coverage

CALC21111 reviews

CALC2128 reviews

MATH2128 reviews

MATH2137 reviews

MATH2116 reviews

Show 4 more courses

MATH4 reviews

2123 reviews

MATH1042 reviews

MATH0581 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

50 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 6 · A 5 · A- 4

B range

B+ 3 · B 9 · B- 1

C range

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

D+ 1 · D 1

F

F 1

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 10 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1

Ruzanna Baytaryan

x x x if you are strong in math, can self-study heavily, and x x x x.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Challenging

Recommended

Depends

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🧮 Course Difficulty

⚖️ x x

🎯 Teaching Quality

📝 x x x x

📚 About Workload

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you are strong in math, can self-study heavily, and .

⚖️

📝