AI Rate Professor

English

Michael Harutunian

ENGL101 · ENG103 · ENG101 · 176 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
28.81%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take him only if you want a challenging writing class and ; if GPA protection matters.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh essay graderVague expectationsOff-topic lecturesHard to reachHelpful only if proactive
  • Many students say , and .
  • Positive and thought-provoking discussions.
  • Online and unpredictable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A is possible, but students repeatedly say it and .

Both formats report harsh grading, with online reviews more often describing randomness and office-hour dependence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The writing content is not always conceptually hard, but vague prompts and off-topic lectures make the class harder than it should be.

In-person reviews stress disconnected lectures, while online reviews stress weak structure and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, though some in-person reviews say showing up matters.

Online evidence centers on , while in-person evidence suggests presence can affect success.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

because , and discouraging.

Both formats contain strong avoid warnings, with only a and intellectual depth.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

as harsh, picky, inconsistent, and based on few high-stakes papers.

Format shift

adding complaints about missing rubrics and random grades.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload is mostly papers and readings rather than constant small assignments, but .

Format shift

Online students mention many essays and office-hour dependence, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Some students value his insight and feedback, but , and poor communication.

Format shift

Online reviews criticize lack of structure, while and email response.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Grades , and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews emphasize harsh paper , and a few strong lectures for engaged students.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Would not recommend to take this class, you get graded harshly on your papers with .”
101
“ grade.”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are polarized but mostly warn , and needing office hours to understand expectations.

Main concern

Students often feel unsupported unless they actively seek help.

What students said

“ . No rubric, so there's no way to know if you're on the right track unless you meet in .”
101
“This was 100% online, with .”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly describe papers and essay-based work, while .

Essay-Based AssessmentsFew High-Stakes AssignmentsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and one review describes two essay exams, but exam rules are not consistently proven.

Essay Exams MentionedPaper-Heavy Grading
“two 2 hour exams to read document and write essay”
101

Online

Online reviews mention papers and one test-heavy tag, but do not clearly .

Essay-Based WorkExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Expect a lot of .”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . No rubric, so there's no way to know if you're on the right track unless you meet in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“ . English has always been my beset subject but this man ruined it for me.”

⚖️

18/100

“ and is very hard to please even after taking his suggestion.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

24/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are so off topic and all over the place.
  • He's a good teacher and helps you think more broadly.
  • His lectures were very in-depth and explored the world through a new lens.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you're just trying to get an easy A, .
  • .
  • grade.

Theme 3

📬 About Support

  • .
  • Professor makes himself readily available.
  • If you actively ask questions on how .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

176

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years and both formats show a consistent pattern of and mixed teaching experiences.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 575
4 out of 529
3 out of 512
2 out of 524
1 out of 536

Course coverage

ENG10121 reviews
10120 reviews
ENG1034 reviews
1033 reviews
1021 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGL1011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 1 · A 10 · A- 2

B range

21

B+ 5 · B 11 · B- 5

C range

7

C+ 3 · C 3 · C- 1

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2