AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Matthew Aivazian

MATH213 · MATH101 · STATISTICS101 · MATH103 · MATH215 · MATH211 · MATH214 · MATH102 · MATH58 · MATH60 · MATH070 · MATH060 · MATH104 · 47 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
13.79%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and can teach yourself from the textbook.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest HeavyConfusing LecturesLots of HomeworkTough GraderSelf-Teaching Required
  • Most students describe lectures as .
  • Grades are usually driven by hard tests that .
  • A few students say passing is possible with strong effort, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

26/100

Getting an A usually requires heavy self-study and helps a little.

, while online reviews sound even less forgiving and more chaotic.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The math content feels much harder because , and often do not prepare students for tests.

Online and and test mismatch rather than easy content.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several students say class attendance or .

In-person evidence says skipping class hurts, while one .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

because they describe poor teaching, difficult exams, and low support.

Both formats are mostly negative, with online reviews especially harsh about communication and grading.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call him a and partial support.

Format shift

and finals.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

, and heavy preparation for tests.

Format shift

Both formats report lots of homework, with in-person reviews most consistently describing 60-question assignments.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

The dominant pattern is that , and leaves students to self-teach.

Format shift

Online and , though a few in-person reviews praise his kindness.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

Grades are described as exams and finals.

Format shift

Both formats describe test-heavy grading, with online reviews emphasizing finals and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person , and tests that dominate the grade.

Main concern

and prepare for difficult tests.

What students said

“ .”
MATH103
“Be ready to teach yourself from the textbook.”
MATH102
“ .”
MATH58

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly negative, with , and at least one course requiring campus quizzes.

Main concern

, and weak support.

What students said

“This professor is by far the .”
MATH213
“ .”
MATH211
“You are expected to go on campus and .”
MATH103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are repeatedly described as hard, heavily weighted, and .

Hard TestsTest HeavyFew Practice MatchesNo Calculators MentionedCampus Quizzes Mentioned

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and one review explicitly mentions no calculators.

No Calculators MentionedHard In-Person TestsTest Heavy
“ guides”
MATH103
“ .”
MATH103
“ , so if you miss one your grade is tanked.”
102

Online

Online and finals, but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Hard Online TestsHeavy FinalsCampus Quizzes Mentioned
“Then the and reconfigurations of problems that the practice test did NOT prepare us for.”
STATISTICS101
“We were given 2 hours for a classmates finished.”
MATH213
“You are expected to go on campus and .”
MATH103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be ready to teach yourself from the textbook.”

Voice snapshots generated from 47 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“He cannot lecture so expect to be learning through strictly youtube videos and the textbook.”

⚖️

18/100

“On tests, you will get 3 out of 5 for most of your problems even if you get them right because you only missed one step.”

🧪

22/100

“The , and diff from the homework, so prepare for that!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Strictly reads off the himself.
  • He didn't really teach, just read off the slideshow so I didn't learn much.
  • Prof A. is a nice man, but he can't teach for (you know what).

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • .
  • Do the .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Advice

  • .
  • Trust me stay away from this guy.
  • unless you want to fail.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

47

Recent reviews read by the AI

47

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 47 reviews span many years and show a consistent pattern of , and .

Inside 47 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 57
2 out of 56
1 out of 527

Course coverage

1029 reviews
MATH1039 reviews
MATH1026 reviews
MATH1015 reviews
MATH0603 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH2133 reviews
MATH0702 reviews
MATH1042 reviews
MATH2112 reviews
MATH2152 reviews
MATH2141 review
MATH581 review
MATH601 review
STATISTICS1011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

9

B+ 1 · B 8

C range

6

C 5 · C- 1

D range

3

D+ 1 · D 2

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 3