AI Rate Professor

Communication

Ally Loprete

COMS105 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a and can keep up with participation and deadlines.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring CoachStrong FeedbackEngaging SpeakerStrict Late WorkParticipation Heavy
  • Most students describe her as caring, engaging, and confidence-building.
  • Grades are very achievable, but missed or late work can hurt quickly.
  • A minority of students find her structure, self-focus, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is very reachable if students complete work on time, but , and participation rules prevent it from being effortless.

Online evidence is one supportive review with strict late penalties, while and participation.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The and confidence-building, though speeches, group work, and public participation can challenge anxious students.

, but in-person reviews show more pressure from live participation and group dynamics.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Attendance and participation are often treated as important, and .

The ; the online review does not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

and useful feedback, despite a few serious complaints about structure and tone.

The online review is positive but limited, while but mixed recommendation evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

She is often easy on speeches and offers clear criteria, but late work and .

Format shift

Online and deadline penalties.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload is usually doable, but speeches, outlines, group work, and .

Format shift

, while the online review focuses mainly on late penalties.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students , and confidence-building, though some find her exhausting or poorly suited to them.

Format shift

In-person evidence is rich and mostly positive, while online evidence is positive but only one review.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades appear to come from speeches, assignments, participation, group work, and .

Format shift

, and a 100-question final, while online evidence does not clearly describe exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are , and confidence-building, with some complaints about structure and workload.

Main concern

Participation, speeches, group work, and deadlines require steady attention.

What students said

“She made me both a better communicater and public speaker.”
COMS-105
“ , but .”
COMS-105

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online , and strict about late penalties.

Main concern

Late deductions can damage the grade.

What students said

“She is a , so there is no way you can't pass the class unless you put in 0 effort.”
COMS-105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention speeches, assignments, and a , but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or closed-book rules.

SpeechesAssignmentsFinal Test

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention speeches and one 100-question test, but .

Speeches100-Question Test
“ if you are taking other classes, as well as having a 100 questions test at the end of the semester.”
COMS-105

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the format.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Ally will go above and beyond to make sure each of her students is able to personally grow through her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Her lectures are amazing and her teaching is great. i learned so much in her class!”

👍 Recommendation Level

82/100

“I would 100% recommend!”

⚖️

72/100

“She is a , so there is no way you can't pass the class unless you put in 0 effort.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was a very approachable teacher and was very good at explaining the material.
  • She kept the , and easy to understand.
  • The lectures are incredibly boring.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The workload is definitely doable.
  • Make sure you keep on top of everything because .
  • Beware of the 1/3 point deduction per day late for assignments, as that is the main grade destroyer.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She is collaborative and caring, and .
  • She pushes you to look hard at yourself, but supports you to improve yourself.
  • If you find yourself struggling, simply reaching out to her and going to office hours will help so much, trust me!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 21 recent reviews show detailed, mostly consistent patterns with some useful dissent.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

COMS-10521 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 7 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1