AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Luong Le

CALC211 · MATH213 · MATH211 · MATH214 · MATH102 · MATH104 · 282 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
24.46%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you specifically want a demanding math class and , and self-study.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery tough graderHeavy homeworkHigh standardsPolarizing teachingExtra credit available
  • Most students describe Le as extremely difficult, harshly graded, and stressful.
  • A smaller group recommends him for serious math learners who want deep conceptual training.
  • can help, but it does not erase the , and frequent negative teaching experiences.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

20/100

An A is possible for strong and persistent students, but , and heavy work.

Both formats point to strict grading, with online reviews especially negative and in-person reviews showing a small path through .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

The material and teaching style are consistently described as fast, demanding, and difficult to follow.

difficulty, while online reviews add problems with Zoom and communication.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Comments repeatedly warn that skipping class hurts badly and one review .

, while online evidence does not add much beyond participation pressure.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students warn others away because , and classroom tone make the course feel punishing.

Online reviews are uniformly negative, while recommending him for serious math majors.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly say he removes points for not using his exact method and and .

Format shift

Both formats describe harsh grading, but .

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

, and assignments that do not match exams.

Format shift

In-person reviews repeatedly cite 10 to 15 or more hours per week, while online reviews also call the workload too much.

Teaching experience

Awful

24/100

Many students describe unclear lectures, mistakes, poor explanations, rude comments, and a .

Format shift

Online reviews criticize Zoom and communication, while and hostile interactions.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

83/100

Grades appear and quizzes, with homework and used to support or recover grades.

Format shift

and , while online comments also mention exams and unclear deductions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

the class is , and only highly motivated students benefit.

Main concern

Many students report , and a large risk of dropping or struggling.

What students said

“Please take someone else, this class is difficult as it is, but all the added work was too much, and .”
MATH104
“15+ hrs/week, self-study.”
MATH213
“ , if you ACTUALLY want to conceptually learn Linear Algebra; he forces you to learn at a level where conceptual understanding is more important than just pure computation.”
MATH214

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing unclear teaching, , and a bad class atmosphere.

Main concern

Students felt unsupported and .

What students said

“Professor Luong Le was my worst professor I have taken.”
MATH104
“Was not competent at all with Zoom.”
MATH104
“ .”
CALC211

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are repeatedly described as hard and strictly graded, with .

Hard ExamsStrict Partial CreditMethod-Specific GradingExtra Credit Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and strict method-based grading.

Hard ExamsLow Test AveragesMethod-Specific GradingTest Heavy
“avg 50%.”
MATH213
“ and says anything above a 50 is good.”
MATH104
“The , but doable.”
MATH214

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules, but and calculator restrictions.

Strict Exam GradingCalculator RestrictionsUnclear Grading Criteria
“ * as well as exams.”
MATH104
“His tests were not that hard but .”
MATH104

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please take someone else, this class is difficult as it is, but all the added work was too much, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

25/100

“run. even if this class is mandatory for you and . just dont. .”

📉

12/100

“Marked down from 90% -> 60% because I didn't solve the problems 'his way,' had to solve everything EXACTLY like in class for credit.”

🧠 Learning Depth

24/100

“ , if you ACTUALLY want to conceptually learn Linear Algebra; he forces you to learn at a level where conceptual understanding is more important than just pure computation.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His in-class notes were extremely messy and .
  • He just makes a little mistakes then and there and following through his lectures are a bit hard.
  • He was actually really good, if you pay attention to his lectures and ask questions to him.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Very hard grader, if not done .
  • He grades harder than AP classes, but believe me, coming out of this class you WILL understand the math on a deep level.
  • He offers a lot of to make up for .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • homework with 200+ problems that
  • 15+ hrs/week, self-study.
  • Be prepared for no social life if !!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

282

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over multiple years show a highly consistent pattern of , and polarized reactions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 555
4 out of 541
3 out of 543
2 out of 546
1 out of 598

Course coverage

MATH10424 reviews
CALC2116 reviews
MATH2116 reviews
2115 reviews
MATH2133 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH2143 reviews
2021 review
2131 review
MATH1021 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 5

B range

10

B+ 5 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

11

C 10 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

14

Drop/Withdrawal 8 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 1