AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Susan Milne

TRIG102 · STATS140 · MATH060 · MATH140 · MATH100 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take her if you care more about a forgiving grade .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLenient gradingExtra creditMixed clarityStudy-guide testsInconsistent teaching
  • Many students say grades are lenient, with and study guides helping a lot.
  • Teaching quality is inconsistent, with and clear while .
  • The course can be an easy A, but students may need to .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Grades are often easy because of , and forgiving structures, even when lectures are confusing.

Online reviews mention light grading, while , study-guide tests, and easy A outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The math content is not always hard, but and disorganization can make it feel harder than the material itself.

Online evidence is mixed on clarity, while but lectures can be confusing.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and flexibility appears to vary by course structure.

, so the score is based on limited comments about availability and support.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and patience, but not by those who need strong lecture clarity.

Online reviews are sharply mixed, while but mixed on teaching clarity.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Students repeatedly mention light grading, , study guides, and easy A outcomes.

Format shift

, while online reviews also mention light grading.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload is manageable but , and enough practice to keep up.

Format shift

and project structure, while online reviews give less workload detail.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Teaching is highly inconsistent, with some students praising patience and detail while .

Format shift

Online reviews are split between very clear and very poor, while reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

Assessment includes assignments, quizzes, projects, exams, a , and study-guide-based tests.

Format shift

, while online reviews mainly discuss lectures and grading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and , but several students report confusing lectures and organization issues.

Main concern

Students may need to rely on notes, textbooks, study guides, or .

What students said

“ .”
MATH140
“ and gives lots of .”
STATS140
“Most because I was not sure what she was talking about in class.”
STATS140

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online and one strong complaint about vague lectures and indirect answers.

Main concern

Lecture clarity can be unreliable, so students may need outside resources.

What students said

“She gives step by step instructions and grades lightly.”
TRIG102
“Professor Milne is great and easy to understand.”
MATH140
“She teaches as if you already know what she is talking about.”
MATH100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is moderately student-friendly because tests match study guides, but reviews .

Study-Guide TestsCumulative FinalQuizzesProject

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, projects, and a cumulative final, but do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring rules.

Study-Guide TestsCumulative FinalQuizzesProject
“ .”
MATH140
“Class consists of five assignments, 3 quizzes, a project and a .”
MATH140
“ and questions before class on exam days”
MATH140

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, webcam rules, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . One project, but not hard at all. Easy A for me & I suck at math”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

📈 Easy A Potential

82/100

“She gives step by step instructions and grades lightly.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Most because I was not sure what she was talking about in class.”

⚖️

88/100

“ and gives lots of .”

Theme 1

📈 About Grades

  • and gives lots of .
  • .
  • She offers a lot to boost your grade.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She gives step by step instructions and grades lightly.
  • She teaches as if you already know what she is talking about.
  • She is a great teacher! takes her time to lecture, shows samples and .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • .
  • and it was difficult .
  • Most because I was not sure what she was talking about in class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Only twelve reviews are available, with some older comments and sharply mixed experiences across math courses and formats.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1405 reviews
TRIG1023 reviews
STATS1402 reviews
MATH0601 review
MATH1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1