AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mustafa Said

MATH212 · STATC1000 · TRIG102 · MATH211 · MATH102104 · MATH102 · MATH214 · MATH140 · MATH104 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
75.86%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if and handle a direct, sometimes blunt classroom style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPractice exams mirror testsTest heavy gradingFast but clear lecturesStrict quiet classroomMixed bedside manner
  • Most students say , making high grades realistic for prepared students.
  • Teaching is usually direct and example based, but several students describe him as fast paced or rude when answering questions.
  • Grades rely heavily on tests, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A is very reachable if you study the and worksheets because .

, while online evidence is more mixed because some students struggled with test-heavy grading.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The math content can move fast, but repeated examples, study guides, and .

Online reviews mention faster pacing and less structure, while the material easier.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but students repeatedly say lectures and notes are important for passing.

Both formats suggest attendance matters, with online reviews explicitly warning that skipping class can hurt performance.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend him for fair, predictable exams, despite recurring complaints about rude or awkward communication.

, while online reviews are split between strong recommendation and warnings about pace.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grading is favorable because exams often copy practice materials and , though .

Format shift

In-person students give the clearest evidence of mirrored exams, while online students report fewer grade buffers.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Homework and worksheets exist but are often practice focused, while the main workload is studying for exams.

Format shift

Online students describe less graded homework, while , and occasional lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and organized, but the experience is pulled down by repeated reports of rudeness and fast pacing.

Format shift

In-person reviews show stronger praise and stronger criticism, while online reviews emphasize speed and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

, and practice exam preparation rather than broad assignment categories.

Format shift

Both online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and fair tests, while some criticize rude moments, cancellations, and strict lecture behavior.

Main concern

Students who talk during lecture or need warm communication may find him frustrating.

What students said

“ .”
MATH212
“He's extremely rude with students and gets annoyed when you ask for help on something and he doesn't teach very well either.”
MATH104

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mixed, with strong praise for straightforward teaching but concern about fast pacing and .

Main concern

Fast pace and heavy reliance on tests can hurt students who need more structure.

What students said

“He DOES TEACH FAST! but very good.”
MATH-211
“There is no graded homework or other assignments, so if you are struggling with .”
MATH104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are student-friendly because practice tests, study guides, and worksheets often closely match the real exams, though .

Practice Tests Mirror ExamsMultiple Choice ExamsStudy GuidesTest HeavyShort Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and worksheets that closely mirror exams, but do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring policies.

Practice Tests Mirror ExamsStudy GuidesMultiple Choice ExamsTest Heavy
“Which are pretty much a 1/1 copy of the ”
MATH104
“ , and .”
STAT-C1000

Online

and straightforward tests but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesNo Graded Homework
“We and pop quizzes; , but it helped a lot with review.”
MATH104
“ so there's never any surprises.”
MATH102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you study the pretests, you are guaranteed an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“He makes calculus easy to learn if you put in the work.”

📈 Grade Strategy

86/100

“Just study pretest and you will definitely get an A.”

⚠️ Communication Risk

45/100

“He's extremely rude with students and gets annoyed when you ask for help on something and he doesn't teach very well either.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures were very example based but and always asks if there are questions.
  • He moves quickly and focuses on example more than concept.
  • Great teacher! .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • few changes.
  • and the final, but he gives study guides which mirror the .
  • There is no graded homework or other assignments, so if you are struggling with .

Theme 3

🧭 About Classroom Fit

  • Do not talk during lecture.
  • Doesn't like talking and can be rude.
  • would definitely recommend for people who love math & learn quick

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 29 reviews span many years, include detailed comments, and repeat the , and communication.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 58
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH2128 reviews
MATH1045 reviews
MATH1024 reviews
MATH1404 reviews
MATH-2113 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH2142 reviews
MATH1021041 review
STAT-C10001 review
TRIG1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 1 · A 15 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3