AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Nadia Monosov

PSYCH104 · PSYCH103 · PSYCH235 · PSYCH102 · PSYCH240 · PSYCHM01 · PSYCH101 · 82 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
73.24%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with reading, quizzes, and projects.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring teacherClear Canvas structureReading heavyGroup projectsMixed workload
  • , and useful feedback.
  • , and time management.
  • Some students report strict deadlines, difficult group projects, slow grading, or heavy accelerated-course workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Many students earn A grades, but they usually describe steady reading, quizzes, homework, or .

Online reviews include some Easy A comments but also heavy self-teaching, while and effort for the grade.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

She often makes psychology and statistics manageable, but reading, exams, and .

Online sections feel more self-directed and reading-heavy, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Attendance and participation often matter, but reviews do not show a .

and needing to show up, while online reviews focus on deadlines and pacing.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Students usually recommend her because , and helpful when students manage the workload.

, but online reviews show more risk in accelerated and reading-heavy sections.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

67/100

, dropped scores, and feedback appear often, but deadlines and .

Format shift

and , while online reviews are split between clear grading and strict deadline complaints.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The workload is manageable in regular terms but can become heavy in statistics, intersession, and reading-heavy online courses.

Format shift

Online compressed courses draw the strongest workload complaints, while in-person workload varies by course.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students describe her as , and helpful, despite some sharp negative reviews about organization and tone.

Format shift

, while online teaching earns stronger organization praise.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades , and major group projects.

Format shift

, and exams, while in-person sections add more class work and group projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews praise her lectures, care, and feedback, though , and some older organization complaints create mixed risk.

Main concern

Group projects and or get weak teammates.

What students said

“Professor Monosov made stats manageable.”
PSYCH104
“There are 4 exams in total and a ”
PSYCH103
“Lectures are engaging and informational.”
PSYCH101

Remote format

Online

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly positive for organization and , but , and compressed courses can become heavy.

Main concern

Online students often need strong time management and .

What students said

“ and a detailed canvas setup.”
PSYCH103
“Lots of reading and .”
PSYCH235
“The , and as many hours as a full-time job.”
PSYCH104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and exams with standard preparation demands, with limited proof of strict proctoring or open-book rules.

QuizzesExams After ChaptersTimed Exams MentionedAt-Home Quizzes And Exams Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and at-home quizzes and exams, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring requirements.

Four ExamsUnit QuizzesAt-Home Quizzes And Exams
“There are 4 exams in total and a ”
PSYCH103
“Most of the grade was determined by the .”
PSYCH101
“Quizzes and ”
PSYCH101

Online

, and exams after chapters, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Timed QuizzesChapter ExamsTextbook-Based Quizzes
“Know the material for the quizzes/exams as they are timed!”
PSYCH235
“After 3 chapters, there is an exam.”
PSYCH101
“ and her notes”
PSYCH101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Monosov made stats manageable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

👩‍🏫 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Professor Monosov made stats manageable.”

👍 Recommendation Level

78/100

“ ! Easy A.”

📚 Workload Balance

50/100

“Lots of reading and .”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and don't leave you questioning.
  • She made lectures very easy to understand and always kept things interesting.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • I do feel that I had to work hard for my A, but .
  • ALL VIDEOS POSTED
  • The and the right time managing skills.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Risks

  • The .
  • The , and as many hours as a full-time job.
  • and she posts her study guides a day or two days before the test

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

82

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across several years and both formats provide rich, repeated evidence with a but workload-aware pattern.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 551
4 out of 59
3 out of 58
2 out of 55
1 out of 59

Course coverage

PSYCH10419 reviews
PSYCH10116 reviews
PSYCH2356 reviews
PSYCH1035 reviews
PSYCH2402 reviews
Show 2 more courses
PSYCH1021 review
PSYCHM011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

26

A+ 7 · A 16 · A- 3

B range

10

B+ 9 · B 1

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 3