AI Rate Professor

English

Linda Beauregard-Vasquez

ENGLISH101 · ENGL103 · ENGL135 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · EGL101 · ENG103 · 186 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
74.73%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a and can handle steady writing, peer review, and detailed instructions.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and reachableHeavy writing workloadGrading contractStrong feedbackPolarizing style
  • Many students say she is unusually caring and .
  • Grades are helped by contracts, , and deadline flexibility, but students still report a lot of writing.
  • Online reviews are more polarized, with heavier complaints about workload and intrusive grade calls.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

83/100

A good grade is very reachable through the grading contract, , and completing the work, but it is not effortless because the writing load can be heavy.

Both formats support easy B or better evidence, but online students more often describe the effort cost as high.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course is usually manageable for college English, but , and revision keep it from being a simple class.

In-person reviews more often call the class easy if you do the work, while online reviews more often call it tough or heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Attendance and participation appear important, with several in-person comments mentioning required tutoring, peer review, and showing up.

; online reviews do not clearly prove a strict attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

, and grade support, but a vocal minority warn about workload and communication style.

In-person recommendations are stronger and more consistent, while online recommendations are mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

The grading contract, , deadline flexibility, and easy B comments show .

Format shift

Both formats mention grading support, but .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students repeatedly mention many essays, reading, peer reviews, and worthwhile.

Format shift

Online reviews describe the workload as especially stressful, while .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students describe her as caring, motivating, and helpful, but , and uncomfortable comments.

Format shift

, while online feedback is more polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus on essays, homework, projects, peer review, discussion, and .

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-heavy with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students mostly describe a rewards completing the work.

Main concern

Some students find lectures repetitive or unrelated and .

What students said

“Easy B if you do your work.”
ENGL101
“Mandatory tutoring and peer reviewing feels like you do the job for her.”
EGL101
“ .”
ENGL101

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students praise her care and feedback but more often describe the workload and grade calls as stressful.

Main concern

Heavy workload and frequent personal grade contact can feel intrusive.

What students said

“ if you want a personal life outside of it.”
ENG103
“It's tough, but you are guaranteed at least a B if .”
ENG103
“Prof Beauregard-Vasquez CARES.”
ENGLISH101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and essays rather than traditional exams, and reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Essay-Based FinalAssignment-Focused CourseReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and projects, but do not clearly prove a traditional exam format or closed-book policy.

Three EssaysProject-Based Work
“ .”
ENG103
“3 essays about fun topics.”
ENGL103

Online

Online reviews mention a final essay and assignments, but do not clearly .

Essay-Based FinalNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“For actually making a change in the world and it had to be a minimum of like 8 pages long.”
EGL101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She cares. That's the key.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She cares. That's the key.”

📈 Grade Value

83/100

“Easy B if you do your work.”

⚠️ Workload Cost

34/100

“Very very very heavy workload.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She made writing fun and she cared.
  • The entirety of every lecture was her talking about everything irrelevant to the .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • It's tough, but you are guaranteed at least a B if .
  • B.
  • There is a lot of work to do, but it is rewarding.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She even had a potluck on the last day.
  • She takes the time to listen.
  • She is always there for you.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

186

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 detailed reviews span several years and show consistent themes despite polarized experiences.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5131
4 out of 57
3 out of 57
2 out of 57
1 out of 534

Course coverage

ENG10315 reviews
ENGL10113 reviews
EGL1018 reviews
ENGL1038 reviews
ENG1013 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENGLISH1012 reviews
ENGL1351 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

49 reported outcomes

A range

27

A+ 4 · A 22 · A- 1

B range

18

B+ 4 · B 12 · B- 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1