AI Rate Professor

English

Tracey Sherard

ENGC1000 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Be cautious because the available review suggests you may need to succeed with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProVague feedbackSubjective gradingLimited feedbackPoor communication
  • The only review is strongly negative and .
  • The student still earned an A-, so grades may be possible despite a poor teaching experience.
  • Evidence is very limited because there is only one online review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

The single student earned an A-, but the and not easy to navigate.

All evidence comes from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The because the review focuses on feedback quality rather than content complexity.

Only online evidence exists, and it does not clearly describe course content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Only one online review exists and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

The only review is negative because it describes poor communication and .

All recommendation evidence is online, with no in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

The review labels her tough and says essay critique was subjective, but the A- .

Format shift

Only online evidence exists.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The review mentions reading and essays but does not clearly prove a heavy or light workload.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists and workload details are limited.

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

The sole review describes poor communication and as vague and misleading.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, so confidence is low.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The review centers on essays and critique, suggesting assignments are the main assessment evidence.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review criticizes communication and , and limited.

Main concern

The main concern is weak feedback that does not clearly help students improve essays.

What students said

“ , and highly subjective.”
ENGC-1000
“ .”
ENGC-1000

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review mentions a test being graded but does not clearly .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online evidence does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove online exam policy
“My friend had asked the ”
ENGC-1000

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in feedback and communication; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“ , and highly subjective.”

⚖️

35/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Risk

20/100

“the teacher claimed they were bothering the professor !?!?”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫

  • , and highly subjective.
  • .

Theme 2

💬 About Communication

  • My friend had asked the
  • the teacher claimed they were bothering the professor !?!?

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

, so the themes are useful warnings but not enough for a stable judgment.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGC-10001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values