AI Rate Professor

Education

Dawn Rymond

ECE101 · ECE103 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
98/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
84.21%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take Rymond if you want a rewarded with a strong grade.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and supportiveHands-on projectsLenient gradingClear directionsSome workload complaints
  • Most students describe Rymond as caring, engaging, and highly supportive.
  • Grades are generally accessible because , and some late-work leniency.
  • The class often uses hands-on projects and group work, with occasional complaints about workload or organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Getting an A is very realistic if students complete the , and late-work leniency.

steady work, while online evidence is positive but includes one organization complaint.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The material is usually straightforward and hands-on, though short-term sections and .

In-person reviews often call the class easy and understandable, while online reviews say difficulty depends more on organization and pacing.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

Reviews show leniency with late work and support outside class, but they do not clearly prove a .

In-person reviews mention class participation and late-work flexibility, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her because , and motivating.

In-person recommendations are extremely strong, while online recommendations are mostly positive with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Students repeatedly mention , and many A outcomes.

Format shift

In-person leniency is strongly supported, while online grading evidence and one complaint about missing rubrics.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Work is usually doable but , and sometimes 2 to 3 assignments per week.

Format shift

In-person reviews call the workload manageable but sometimes busy, while and organization complaints.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Most students describe her as , and helpful, with only a few strong negative exceptions.

Format shift

, while online teaching evidence is positive overall but less uniform.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and hands-on work rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and projects, and reviews do not provide strong evidence of .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews strongly praise her , and .

Main concern

Some students dislike the amount of work or feel lectures can be too basic or off-topic.

What students said

“She is also very lenient and will accept late work.”
ECE101
“ and is willing to help you.”
ECE101
“She assigns a lot of work and is a .”
ECE101

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive but less consistent, with one complaint about missing rubrics, due dates, and communication.

Main concern

Online organization may vary by course and term.

What students said

“The professor used rubrics, and I saw my grades quickly; I got an A.”
ECE103
“The professor often forgets to put due dates and is very ineffective in communion.”
ECE103
“Dawn was a wonderful professor she worked so well with all of us one on one and in a group.”
ECE101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects and assignments, while , and open-book rules are not clearly proven.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam formatAssignments and projects emphasizedNo clear proctoring evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and assignments, but do not clearly prove exam format or strict testing rules.

Hands-On AssignmentsGroup ProjectsReviews do not clearly prove exam format
“I enjoyed the .”
ECE101
“The .”
ECE101

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam formatNo clear proctoring evidence

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's truly one of the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“ , and engaging.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“ ! Sign up for any of her classes.”

⚖️

88/100

“She is also very lenient and will accept late work.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support

  • She is a and improving her way of teaching.
  • A professor that truly cared for the students.
  • she cares for her students and (:

Theme 2

🧩 About Class Style

  • Her class is very hands on learning and straightforward.
  • I enjoyed the .
  • she created a positive learning environment and is there before & after class to help students.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • It's a pretty easy and interesting class with about 2 to 3 assignments per week.
  • A lot of work but everything is doable.
  • She assigns a lot of work and is a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is supported by 19 reviews across several years, with consistent praise and a .

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECE10116 reviews
ECE1033 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

11

A 11

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1