AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Marco Llaguno

PHIL101 · ETHICS101 · PHIL106 · PHILOS230 · PHILOS106 · PHILO230 · PHILOS250 · PHILOSOPHY120 · PHILOS101 · PHI106 · PHIL100 · PHIL230 · 81 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
91.46%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take him if you want an engaging philosophy professor and can keep up with , and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear and caring teacherLots of extra creditEngaging philosophy lecturesReading and homework expectedAttendance often matters
  • Most students describe him as , and highly recommendable.
  • Grades are usually very attainable because of , and , but students still need to keep up with reading and assignments.
  • In-person PHIL230 reviews show the main risk: some students found homework-before-lecture, tests, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Getting an A is very realistic if students complete readings, homework, and participation work, with and .

Online evidence points to easy credit with steady effort, while and some tougher PHIL230 tests.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The content is usually beginner-friendly because , though readings and logic concepts can still be challenging.

Online reviews mention fast pacing and difficult readings more often, while easier.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

Attendance is often important because and participation work.

In-person reviews clearly show attendance-linked work, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend him because , and makes philosophy engaging.

, though in-person PHIL230 has the clearest cluster of negative experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Grading is usually forgiving due to , clear criteria, full-credit effort opportunities, and helpful comments.

Format shift

Online reviews more directly praise lenient discussion and , while but include some tough-grader complaints.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is manageable but not light, with repeated mentions of , and writing.

Format shift

Online reviews mention steady weekly assignments and reading, while in-person PHIL230 reviews more often complain about lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most students describe him as , and good at making philosophy engaging.

Format shift

Both formats praise his teaching, but style in PHIL230.

Assessment method

Balanced

57/100

Assessment appears balanced , and exams depending on the section.

Format shift

Online reviews mention essays, quizzes, exams, and discussions, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly excellent, especially for lecture engagement and support, but they , and PHIL230 tests.

Main concern

and tests that feel different from the homework.

What students said

“The with in-class work.”
PHIL230
“There so make sure to show up.”
PHILO230
“ .”
PHILO230

Remote format

Online

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are strongly positive, with , and generally manageable assignments.

Main concern

Some online sections are fast paced and reading-heavy, and a few students found exams challenging.

What students said

“He is VERY passionate about the subject & makes it exciting, explains complex ideas simply & his lectures are short & funny.”
PHIL101
“ and is not a .”
PHIL101
“The though he really gives you just enough time to complete the work if your have studied extensively.”
PHIL230

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed and incomplete, with one in-person cheat-sheet policy and some online exam references but .

Cheat Sheet Allowed In One In-Person SectionMultiple Choice And Short Essay ExamsTests Can Be ChallengingExam Policy Not Fully Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

64/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

section and straightforward tests in some sections, but other students found PHIL230 tests mismatched or difficult.

Cheat Sheets AllowedStraightforward TestsSome Tests Differ From Homework
“He made his tests easy by allowing us to make cheat sheets.”
PHILO230
“ ”
PHIL230
“ .”
PHILO230

Online

Online reviews mention exams and quizzes, including MC and short essay exams, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home rules.

Multiple Choice And Short Essay ExamsQuizzes And ExamsSome Challenging Tests
“ .”
PHIL101
“ , and exams.”
PHIL106
“The because some of the but overall a great class and professor.”
PHIL101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I can't imagine taking this course with any other professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and ; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Llaguno is exceptional with you are stuck, and keeps the information entertaining even when it gets slightly abstruse.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“ .”

⚖️

82/100

“ and reading reflections if you show effort.”

📚 Workload Reality

58/100

“Hes a very passionate professor. Although there are a lot of credit on.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is the .
  • Professor Llaguno is an amazing teacher.
  • He makes every topic he covered very fun and is so great at engaging with the class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Class is super easy if you show up and participate in the in and will help you out with logic if you are struggling.
  • He offers loads of EC, so do not worry about your grade.
  • The so make sure to study.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Main Complaints

  • this class had non stop assignments.
  • .
  • He doesn't teach you how to do the on your own time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

81

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 recent reviews span online and and some useful dissent.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 572
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

PHIL10118 reviews
PHIL2307 reviews
PHILO2307 reviews
PHI1064 reviews
PHILOS2304 reviews
Show 7 more courses
PHIL1062 reviews
PHILOS1062 reviews
PHILOSOPHY1202 reviews
ETHICS1011 review
PHIL1001 review
PHILOS1011 review
PHILOS2501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

50 reported outcomes

A range

37

A+ 6 · A 28 · A- 3

B range

10

B+ 5 · B 5

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1