AI Rate Professor

English

Mary Angelino

ENGLISH101 · ENGLISH105 · ENGL105 · ENG105 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · ENG103 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
83.72%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Mary Angelino is highly recommended for students who want a supportive English professor and are willing to keep up with writing assignments.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring Writing CoachClear RubricsEasy A PotentialGreat FeedbackExtra Credit
  • Students , and support for developing writers.
  • Grades are usually very attainable when students follow rubrics, complete essays, and use or tutoring support.
  • The main , and strict attention to requirements or deadlines.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

A grades are common because , and supportive feedback helps, but students must complete multiple papers and follow requirements.

Both formats support easy high grades, while online and in-person reviews mention participation and late-work expectations.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The writing tasks are structured and beginner-friendly, but the course , and time management.

Online courses feel more workload-heavy, while as lighter and more guided.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

, and several comments suggest participation, showing up, or no late work matters.

Online evidence centers on deadlines and weekly work, while and showing up.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and makes English feel manageable.

Recommendation is strong in both formats, with in-person reviews slightly more enthusiastic about classroom support.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

Most students say grading is fair or easy with , and guidance, though page counts and late work can matter.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews more often call her an easy or .

Workload

Moderate

61/100

The workload usually includes several essays, discussions, reading, journals, or workshops, but most students find it manageable.

Format shift

Online reviews report more weekly writing and discussions, while as light or simple.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Reviews , and ability to build student confidence in writing.

Format shift

Both formats show excellent teaching, with and in-person reviews emphasizing classroom support.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment , and participation rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-heavy, with online sections adding more recurring discussions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive, with , and helpful, though a few complain about homework or strict late work.

Main concern

Students must participate, meet page requirements, and .

What students said

“Absolutely ADORE Prof. A!!”
ENG101
“SHE DOES NOT ACCEPT ANY LATE WORK!!!!”
ENG101
“Her class is an easy A+”
ENGL101

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are very positive overall, praising feedback, clear guidelines, , and and reading.

Main concern

Some online students find the writing load, discussions, and .

What students said

“She offers tons of easy and .”
ENGLISH101
“Super chill, easy A class.”
ENG101
“Work is paced like an upper-division class”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and paper-based assessment rather than traditional exams, and they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Essay-Based MidtermPapers Instead Of ExamsNo Traditional Exam EvidenceExtra Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and short writing assessments, but do not clearly prove traditional exam rules or proctoring policies.

Paper-Based GradingShort Midterm WritingNo Proctoring Evidence
“We had 3 essays over 16 weeks”
ENG101
“mid term was just two paragraphs that .”
ENG101
“she guarantees an 85%.”
ENG101

Online

, and discussions, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Essay-Based WorkMidterm MentionedNo Proctoring Evidence
“ .”
ENG101
“Weekly discussion boards/ responses, Prewriting assignments, Journals, Midterm, 4 essays”
ENG101
“The .”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Angelino is hands down the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“She really taught me and responded right away anytime I had a question.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“ .”

⚖️

84/100

“ ... as long as you follow all the guidelines for the four papers you'll write in a semester, she guarantees an 85%.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She teaches very well, gives excellent instruction, and .
  • and .
  • She walks , and gives plenty of time in class .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Super chill, easy A class.
  • Fair amount of work but most of .
  • MAKE SURE you hit the minimum page requirement or your grade WILL reflect that.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She really cares about her students and wanted to see us succeed and become stronger writers.
  • She is always super sweet and willing to help.
  • , and this is coming from someone who isn't a fan and isn't confident about writing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is highly credible because it uses 43 detailed reviews across online and in-person formats with very consistent praise and .

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 534
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG10128 reviews
ENGL1016 reviews
ENG1054 reviews
ENGLISH1012 reviews
ENG1031 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGL1051 review
ENGLISH1051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

37

A+ 18 · A 19

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values