AI Rate Professor

Biology

Ana Almeda

ANATOMY221 · BIO201 · BIO205 · 204BIO · BIO204 · ANATOMY204 · BIOSCI201 · BIOSCI204 · 44 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
61.36%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a caring professor and are ready to study hard for .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring ProfessorExam HeavyExtra CreditHard But RewardingLecture Heavy
  • Many students praise her as caring, passionate, and helpful, especially for students who want to learn biology seriously.
  • The course is consistently described as , and and physiology.
  • and , but others report vague or tricky exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic for prepared students because of and lecture-based exams, but it usually requires steady study and .

Online evidence is positive but limited, while in-person reviews show both many A outcomes and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The biology content is naturally demanding, with , and practicals that require consistent memorization and understanding.

Both formats describe the material as hard, with and lecture exams.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

as mandatory, but many comments say lectures, videos, participation, and lab practice are essential to passing.

and lab, while online reviews emphasize keeping up with lectures and assignments.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend her because she cares, explains difficult material, and offers , though .

Online reviews are uniformly positive in tone, while and more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

helps, but exams and short answers are often detailed, picky, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention , while in-person reviews more often describe tough or .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students frequently report lots of , and exam preparation.

Format shift

Online reviews warn assignments can pile up, while , and long study hours.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students describe her as caring, passionate, and helpful, though some report disorganization, rushed lectures, or .

Format shift

Online reviews are strongly positive about her support, while and serious complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

Grades are repeatedly described as , and finals, with assignments often carrying less weight.

Format shift

, and online reviews also mention lecture exams and lab practicals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but mostly praise her care and teaching while warning that , and studying are demanding.

Main concern

and practicals, and some students find exam expectations vague or tricky.

What students said

“Hard class, but doable if you study and understand concepts.”
ANATOMY204
“ , and other assignments barely move your grade.”
BIO205
“She truly wants her students to succeed but will make you work HARD for your grade.”
BIO204

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are positive overall, describing a caring teacher and difficult but manageable work that requires steady studying.

Main concern

Online students still warn that and the class takes consistent work.

What students said

“Professor Almeda wants you to learn, not just memorize!”
BIOSCI201
“This class in general is hard so you really have to put in the effort to pull through.”
BIO204
“ because it will pile up.”
BIOSCI204

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are mostly standard but demanding, with , and detailed short answers softened by in many classes.

Lecture ExamsLab PracticalsMultiple ChoiceShort AnswerExtra CreditOne Open Note Final

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe lecture exams, lab practicals, multiple choice, short answer, essay questions, and .

Lecture ExamsLab PracticalsMultiple ChoiceShort AnswerOnline Open Note Final
“ and open note.”
BIO205
“4 lecture exams, 4 lab practicals, 1 lecture final”
BIO204
“ , and free response while her lab practicals are 100 questions free response.”
BIO204

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, or open-book policies, but and .

Lecture ExamsLab Practicals
“she did her absolute best to prepare us for and lab practicals.”
BIOSCI204
“detail is key in the short answer portion of exams.”
BIO204

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her class is difficult and requires a lot of time but that is the point as long as you put in the time and effort this class is very fun and rewarding.”

Voice snapshots generated from 44 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Professor Almeda is one of the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

76/100

“If !”

⚖️

48/100

“Tests are worth 65% of your grade, so and you'll be fine.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes the lectures and lab lectures so fun and engaging.
  • so class can understand easily and always answers questions.
  • Her lectures were just her reading off the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class is a very difficult class, but she makes the material bearable.
  • She won't easily give the answers.
  • If you put in the work you should do fine as she offers PLENTY of .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She truly cares about her students and offers opportunities to help improve your grade.
  • Probably the .
  • , and enthusiastic.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

44

Recent reviews read by the AI

44

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-four reviews over many years provide detailed, mostly consistent evidence , and heavy study demands.

Inside 44 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 58
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 510

Course coverage

BIO20415 reviews
BIO2059 reviews
ANATOMY2046 reviews
BIOSCI2046 reviews
BIOSCI2014 reviews
Show 3 more courses
BIO2012 reviews
204BIO1 review
ANATOMY2211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

37 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 3 · A 12 · A- 1

B range

9

B+ 2 · B 5 · B- 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1