AI Rate Professor

Physics

Menoa Yousefi

PHYSICS220 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
92.31%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a feel fair and approachable.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring Physics TeacherFunny LecturesGenerous GraderFormula Sheet ExamsHelpful Office Hours
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Yousefi as caring, funny, and highly supportive.
  • Physics remains challenging, but and often supported by formula sheets, group work, and .
  • Grades appear very attainable because students report , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Physics still requires work, but , and generous grading make high grades very attainable.

The online review supports flexibility and , while in-person reviews add stronger evidence of formula sheets and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Physics is inherently difficult, but his humor, group work, and support make the material easier to handle.

Both formats describe a hard course made manageable, with and exams.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Reviews emphasize flexibility with homework and labs, but they do not clearly prove a .

Online evidence explicitly says he is flexible with homework and labs, while in-person evidence focuses more on help and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and effective for a difficult physics course.

Both formats are highly positive, though the online conclusion rests on only one review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students mention , and not being a .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions and fair tests, while in-person reviews repeatedly describe generous or .

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The , and reading, but students describe the load as fair and manageable.

Format shift

and labs, with online evidence also noting flexibility.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students consistently praise his care, humor, engaging teaching, office hours, and willingness to answer questions.

Format shift

, while the single online review also praises his teaching and humor.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and exams rather than a purely exam-based structure.

Format shift

Online and , labs, group work, and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews strongly praise his humor, care, helpfulness, fair tests, formula sheets, and .

Main concern

A few students say some lectures or .

What students said

“He allows and answers any questions you might have.”
Physics-220
“he is not a .”
66730
“While the lectures are of poor quality, the and caring.”
Physics-220

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review says the class is fair, flexible, and supported by , and lecture.

Main concern

Only one online review limits confidence about the format.

What students said

“ .”
66730
“He is flexible with homework and labs and will assign at the end of class.”
66730

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as fair and student-friendly because students can use formula or cheat sheets and receive reasonable credit for work.

Formula SheetCheat Sheets AllowedFair TestsExtra CreditPartial Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, medium-difficulty exams, and non-harsh grading.

Formula SheetCheat Sheets AllowedMedium Difficulty TestsPartial Credit
“you get to make a formula sheet as well.”
Physics-220
“He allows ”
Physics-220
“If there is reasoning behind your !”
66730

Online

The but does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or formula-sheet policy for online exams.

Fair Tests
“ .”
66730

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The best Physics 220 professor at College of the Canyons.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“Lectures are very engaging.”

❤️ Student Support

94/100

“He takes the time to learn about all of his students and makes lab and lectures fun.”

⚖️

90/100

“he is not a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very funny professor and explained the concepts in an engaging and interesting way.
  • Great and easy to follow lectures.
  • He makes learning enjoyable and .

Theme 2

📈 About Exams And Grades

  • the problems are similar or the same as homework and group work problems
  • He allows
  • He is a

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • super chill professor, very friendly and cares about students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 13 recent reviews are very consistent, though the online format has only one review and one negative cheating concern appears.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

667309 reviews
Physics-2204 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 5 · A 5

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1