AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Monette Bartel

MATH · MATH170 · MATH025 · PALMATH05860 · MATH60 · MATH070 · MATH060 · MATH058 · MATH104 · 80 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
43.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if her lecture style works for you, you attend every class, and you are ready to study notes heavily for tests.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing teaching styleTest heavyExtra credit availableStrict attendance impactSelf-study risk
  • Student experiences and disorganized lectures that leave students teaching themselves.
  • Grades often depend on quizzes and but frequent .
  • Missing class can hurt badly because notes and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible through note-based studying and , but and many students say the class can punish weak preparation.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The math content can feel manageable with clear step-by-step instruction, but many students find the and the pace .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

because missing class often means missing the notes and quiz or .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students recommend her only when they connect with her teaching style, while because of and harsh tests.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

and dropped scores help, but and unclear expectations.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

There is often little or , but frequent quizzes and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Teaching quality is deeply inconsistent across reviews, ranging from caring and and unhelpful.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

Grades are repeatedly described as based mainly on quizzes, chapter tests, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with some students praising clear step-by-step teaching and , and little help with questions.

Main concern

The main concern is a rely on self-study.

What students said

“Get ready to teach yourself because all she does in lecture is make you copy already solved problems off a post-it note.”
MATH104
“ . Your grade solely relied on , but she gave out lots of along with the tests.”
070
“She is funny and likes to make jokes. and shows all the steps and will answer any questions.”
MATH060

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show a , but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Test HeavyQuizzesFinalExtra Credit On Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and finals as central to the grade, with mixed reports on alignment and grading strictness.

Test HeavyQuizzesFinalExtra Credit On Tests
“Her lectures are exactly was is on the tests.”
MATH104
“YOUR ENTIRE GRADE IS BASED OFF OF .”
MATH070
“Lots of quizzes and tests but as long as you do the work, follow along in class and do the .”
MATH060

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ms. Bartel has a teaching style that you either LOVE or you HATE.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and tests. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Ms. Bartel has a teaching style that you either LOVE or you HATE.”

📈 Grade Strategy

58/100

“ . Your grade solely relied on , but she gave out lots of along with the tests.”

⚠️ Test Pressure

34/100

“ and poorly aligned with lectures.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Bartel goes through problems step by step during the lectures.
  • and often skipped over key concepts, leaving students to teach themselves outside of class.
  • She has you copy the problems down that have already been worked through!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I failed the but still ended with an A.
  • She doesn't just give out A's, you'll have to earn it.
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She always tries her best to make sure everyone understands what is going on.
  • Absolutely will not teach or answer ANY of your questions.
  • Bartel is pretty humorous and does care about her students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

80

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 detailed in-person reviews over many years with a consistent split between strong praise and severe criticism.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 537
4 out of 510
3 out of 56
2 out of 510
1 out of 517

Course coverage

MATH06014 reviews
MATH10411 reviews
MATH0707 reviews
MATH0585 reviews
0703 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH3 reviews
MATH1702 reviews
0251 review
430341 review
MATH0251 review
MATH601 review
PALMATH058601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

36 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 5 · A 10 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

11

Drop/Withdrawal 7 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2