AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Hasmik Mkrtchyan

FA51142 · M70 · MATH103 · MATH102 · MATH070 · MATH060 · MATH058 · MATH104 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if , and a teaching style that students experience very differently.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra credit helpsHeavy homeworkMixed teaching clarityTough gradingCaring but inconsistent
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who found her caring with and students who found her unclear, rude, or hard to understand.
  • Grades , and , but several students describe harsh grading and test-heavy grading.
  • Most evidence is from in-person classes, with the only online review being strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A , and , but students repeatedly say the class takes real effort and tests matter heavily.

The online review gives no easy-A evidence, while and warnings about harsh tests.

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The math content is not always described as advanced, but , and .

Online evidence points to self-teaching, while confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

and learning, but reviews do not clearly prove a strict mandatory policy.

The online student stopped attending, while low participation hurts performance.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Recommendation is split because some students strongly praise her care and while others warn against taking her.

The single online review is negative, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and dropped tests help, but several students still describe her as a tough or .

Format shift

Online grading evidence is limited, while and .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Many reviews mention lots of work is doable.

Format shift

Both the online review and many in-person .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some students call her caring and clear, but many others report communication problems, fast pacing, and unhelpful responses to questions.

Format shift

The online review is strongly negative, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and few other grade-growth opportunities, with homework and as support.

Format shift

Both formats include test-heavy comments, but and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are polarized, with some praising her care and while , and frustration with questions.

Main concern

Teaching clarity and .

What students said

“A lot of homework but very doable.”
MATH102
“She grades harshly and .”
MATH104
“Her study guides reflects the .”
MATH070

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review says the class was hard to learn from and .

Main concern

Poor communication and weak instructor support online.

What students said

“Was difficult to learn from this prof so I relied on the class.”
MATH104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show a test-heavy structure with some student-friendly supports like and study guides, but .

Test HeavyFinal ExamExtra CreditStudy Guides Sometimes Match Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe multiple tests and and study guides, but no clearly proven proctoring or .

Five TestsFinal ExamExtra CreditStudy Guides
“The 5 tests and the because there is no other room for growth.”
MATH104
“ .”
M70

Online

The online review says the course was test heavy but does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown .

Test Heavy
“Was difficult to learn from this prof so I relied on the class.”
MATH104

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are serious about learning I highly recommend this class. during the lectures and you will do great.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“She is good at teaching and will make sure you understand the concepts before she moved on.”

⚖️

48/100

“She grades harshly and .”

📚 Workload

32/100

“A lot of homework but very doable.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her , but she does have a tendency of going way too fast.
  • She cannot teach for her life.
  • She is an amazing professor , she is very clear about what the concepts that we will be tested on.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The 5 tests and the because there is no other room for growth.
  • gives tons of .
  • If and try then you will definitely get over 100% in the class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is a caring professor.
  • She is not a fair professor, and is extremely rude.
  • She really wants her students to pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 21 reviews across several years with rich but highly .

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH1046 reviews
MATH0704 reviews
MATH1034 reviews
MATH0602 reviews
MATH1022 reviews
Show 3 more courses
FA511421 review
M701 review
MATH0581 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

4

C 4

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1