AI Rate Professor

Drafting

Jeff Koerner

CO110 · ENGINEERING110 · ENG101 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

Take him if you want a grading.

Best fit · Easy A HunterCaring CAD MentorEasiest GraderHelpful During ExamsClear FeedbackHighly Recommended
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Koerner as caring, patient, and willing to help one-on-one.
  • Grades are very lenient, with multiple comments calling the class an easy A.
  • Exam evidence is mostly student-friendly, including open-book tests and direct help, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

96/100

Multiple students explicitly call the class an easy A, with , and .

The easy A evidence , while the one online review only says doing the work and studying should be enough.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

CAD and engineering content is made approachable through straightforward lectures, patient step-by-step help, and .

, while the single online review says students should have some math and science background.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance appears important because one student warns not to miss class and .

In-person reviews mention class attendance and , while the .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students repeatedly say they would take him again because , and lenient.

Recommendation evidence is overwhelmingly in-person, with the lone online review positive but less enthusiastic.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

97/100

Students call him the , and report easy A outcomes.

Format shift

, while online grading evidence is minimal.

Workload

Light

82/100

Most comments frame the work as manageable, though student.

Format shift

, while the online review only says students must do all work and study.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students describe him as , and consistently available to help at the computer.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is extensive and highly positive, while online evidence is too limited for a strong separate pattern.

Assessment method

Balanced

56/100

Comments mention labs, projects, midterms, finals, and and exams.

Format shift

, and final, while the online review only mentions midterms.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews are strongly positive, , and easy A potential.

Main concern

and questions were not answered, but this is an outlier.

What students said

“This guy was the and someone who still cared about you and your wellbeing for your grade.”
ENGINEERING110
“He will give you 7 points each class just for existing.”
ENGINEERING110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review says students need some math and science foundation but can do fine by doing the work and studying.

Main concern

Online evidence is limited and .

What students said

“If you do all the work and study for the .”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is student-friendly overall because and direct help, while online exam policy is not clearly proven.

Open Book TestsHelpful During ExamsMidterm and Final HelpNo Tricky Questions

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support open-book tests and and finals.

Open Book TestsHelpful During ExamsMidterm and Final Help
“the ”
ENGINEERING110
“ and and final.”
ENGINEERING110

Online

The online review only says midterms have no tricky questions, and reviews do not .

No Tricky QuestionsMidterms Mentioned
“No tricky questions.”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Greatest professor I had in this school.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“He is always open for questions and will assist you at your computer if you still do not get it.”

💯 Easy A Potential

96/100

“Funny man, and Awesome man here! Easy A”

❤️ Student Support

98/100

“He really wants his students to succeed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his lectures are very straightforward.
  • and always willing to redo steps in the lab to help students.
  • He would walk around and help every student.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • This guy was the
  • He will give you 7 points each class just for existing.
  • , but he is reasonably lenient about late work if you ask.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • the
  • No tricky questions.
  • and and final.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across many years are detailed and highly consistent, with .

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGINEERING1108 reviews
ENG1013 reviews
CO1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1