AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ciro Ramirez

MATH140STATS · MATH102 · MATH058 · STATS140 · MATH070 · MATH75 · MATH140 · MATH130 · MATH075 · MATH104 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
36.36%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you can teach yourself math and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesHarsh gradingSelf-teaching neededTest heavyMandatory participation
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, but many students .
  • Success , and tolerance for his grading style.
  • Students , and limited flexibility.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Even students who earn high grades describe the class as , and adapting to his exact methods.

Online reviews show low A confidence, while but usually with heavy self-direction.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The math content becomes harder because lectures are often described as .

Online students mention getting lost in lectures, while and self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, and being present are important or mandatory.

, while online reviews still emphasize participation and not skipping.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Students recommend him only if you are independent, disciplined, and comfortable with and uneven lectures.

Online reviews are mostly discouraging, while but still carry many strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Many students call him picky, harsh, or unforgiving, with little and .

Format shift

Both formats mention strict grading, but for doing work his way.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and study demands are recurring concerns, though some older reviews call the workload manageable.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize textbook and WebAssign homework, while in-person .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Reviews often describe him as who can teach themselves.

Format shift

Online teaching is described as , while and very confusing.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Students , and a group project, with exams carrying major risk.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tests, quizzes, homework, and a final project, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are highly divided, with some praising his clarity but , and self-teaching pressure.

Main concern

Students often say his class is unforgiving if .

What students said

“ .”
MATH140
“Half of the class failed.”
MATH140STATS

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing , and difficult tests.

Main concern

Online students report that they had to rely on outside resources and careful attention to survive.

What students said

“I still passed with the help of khan academy”
MATH102
“ but the as well as the textbook”
STATS140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because , and strict grading, but exam format rules are not clearly proven.

Hard TestsNo Study Guides MentionedPop Quizzes MentionedFew Test Questions

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

study guides, quizzes, and group projects, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Hard TestsFew Test QuestionsNo Study Guides Mentioned
“doesn't give study guides for exams so it leaves u guessing”
MATH140STATS
“there are about 12 questions on each test”
MATH102

Online

, and textbook-based grading, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book rules, or Lockdown Browser.

Hard TestsPop Quizzes MentionedHomework-Based Quizzes
“ but the as well as the textbook”
STATS140
“be aware of and tests”
MATH140STATS

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly, if you are the type of person who teaches themselves math, then you would pass this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Sometimes he'll go off track and you can get lost in his lectures.”

⚖️

25/100

“He's a ”

👍 Recommendation Risk

34/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He teaches as if you already know the subject.
  • His style is a .
  • .

Theme 2

📉 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Half of the class failed.
  • No or anything that can help boost ur grade.
  • You need to be very disciplined to pass...

Theme 3

🧭 About Class Fit

  • if you are the type of person who teaches themselves math, then you would pass this class.
  • and study well and you should be good.
  • if .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 37 reviews across a long time span, with consistent patterns despite some course-level disagreement.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 57
3 out of 56
2 out of 512
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH0756 reviews
MATH1025 reviews
MATH1405 reviews
MATH140STATS5 reviews
MATH1303 reviews
Show 7 more courses
STATS1403 reviews
0752 reviews
MATH0582 reviews
MATH0702 reviews
MATH752 reviews
1401 review
MATH1041 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

6

C+ 1 · C 4 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1