AI Rate Professor

Paralegal Studies

Sanaz Nikbakhsh

PARLGL150 · PARALEGAL150 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
27.27%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless you have no alternative and , and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized CanvasLate GradingUnresponsiveTest HeavyFew Grades
  • Online reviews are strongly negative because , and communication appear unreliable.
  • finding her kind or improved but many reporting disorganization and .
  • Grades depend heavily on a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A is possible, but , and the need to keep up make the true cost high.

Online evidence is worse because students report ungraded work, while but and few grades.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The assignments are sometimes described as manageable, but , and disorganized lectures make the course feel harder.

Online students say assignments are not hard but course management is poor, while , and reading.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several in-person tags and comments warn that skipping class or missing work makes passing difficult.

; online reviews do not clearly describe attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students do not recommend her because of , and confusing assessment structure.

Online reviews are uniformly negative, while but remain mostly cautious or negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Grades , and delayed grading creates uncertainty despite some late-work flexibility.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize missing grades, while and hard quizzes.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Some students report , but , and falling behind create real pressure.

Format shift

Online workload sounds simple but poorly managed, while reading and quizzes.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students repeatedly describe disorganized lectures, weak communication, delayed grading, and her nice or knowledgeable.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is strongly negative, while but still dominated by organization concerns.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Comments and tags repeatedly mention quizzes, tests, and few graded items as major grade drivers.

Format shift

, while online reviews focus more on assignments and missing grades.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and improved to very disorganized, with recurring complaints about quizzes, few grades, and hard recovery after missing work.

Main concern

A few high-stakes grades and .

What students said

“ class.”
PARALEGAL150
“If you care about your grades/GPA, STAY AWAY from this professor and class.”
PARLGL150
“She's fairly standard. Grades a bit late, but is willing to accept late work if you tell her before hand.”
PARLGL150

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe a badly managed class with missing Canvas materials, little communication, and .

Main concern

Students may not know their grade or due dates because grading and .

What students said

“Semester ended last week and there's 2+ months of ”
PARLGL150
“This class is a nightmare! !”
PARLGL150
“ and regularly forgets ”
PARLGL150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , but and test risk because assessments are hard, few, and sometimes misaligned.

Hard QuizzesTest HeavyFew Graded ItemsUnclear Quiz Coverage

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, closed-book, midterm, or .

Hard QuizzesTest HeavyFew Graded Items
“ class.”
PARALEGAL150
“I kept failing the quizzes and .”
PARLGL150
“ ”
PARLGL150

Online

Online reviews do not clearly .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class is a nightmare! !”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course management. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Her lectures were all over the place. .”

⚖️

25/100

“Semester ended last week and there's 2+ months of ”

👍 Recommendation Level

22/100

“ however she is the only instructor for family law.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Organization

  • and regularly forgets
  • Lectures are all over the place.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Tests

  • class.
  • Grades a bit late, but is willing to accept late work if you tell her before hand.

Theme 3

❤️ About Positive Notes

  • She cares a lot about her students, but WORK from start.
  • Not a lot of homework and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across several years include detailed and consistent comments, though the online record.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

PARLGL1508 reviews
PARALEGAL1503 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 4