AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Gagik Barsegian

CALC211 · MATH083 · MATH103 · MATH215 · MATH211 · MATH102 · MATH70 · MATH058 · MATH070 · MATH060 · MATH130 · MATH100 · MATH104 · 77 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take him only if , and benefit from lenient grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCaring but unevenAccent barrierLenient partial creditHeavy homeworkSelf-teaching risk
  • many students find him caring and generous, while many others struggle with communication and lecture clarity.
  • Lower-level in-person math courses receive more positive comments than online or higher-level calculus-style courses.
  • Grades can be helped by partial credit and extensions, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Lenient grading, partial credit, and extensions help, but , and .

, while online reviews more often describe harsh grading and self-teaching.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Math content is often difficult, and harder to learn.

Online reviews describe the course as harder because of poor online teaching, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

because students need examples, homework review, and .

In-person reviews often stress showing up, while online reviews mention lengthy Zooms but .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Students recommend him when they value caring and , but .

In-person recommendations are mixed but include strong positives, while online recommendations are much weaker.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Many students cite partial credit, extensions, and , but several online and .

Format shift

as lenient, while online grading receives more harsh-grading complaints.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and study guides create a heavy math workload, especially if students procrastinate.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy homework, with online reviews describing it as more frustrating.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

He is often caring and patient, but communication barriers, monotone lectures, and weak online delivery reduce teaching quality.

Format shift

In-person teaching is mixed and sometimes strong, while online teaching is frequently criticized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

84/100

Reviews repeatedly , and study guides, with exams carrying major weight.

Format shift

Both online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with strong praise for caring and partial credit but frequent complaints about accent, pace, and .

Main concern

Students may struggle to understand lectures because of accent, quiet delivery, or .

What students said

“He's generous with partial credit, rewards effort, and worked with .”
MATH211
“very hard to pass the class if you can't understand the professor.”
MATH102

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing poor online , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Online students often report needing to teach themselves because lectures and .

What students said

“This professor is suited for in a classroom setting, not online learning.”
MATH100
“Calc 211 is a mess online.”
MATH211

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is standard to moderately tough, with many tests and finals but and partial credit.

Four Exams And FinalHomework-Based TestsStudy Guides SometimesPartial CreditNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

54/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals, often based on homework or book examples, with some partial credit and no clear proof of closed-book rules.

Four Exams And FinalHomework-Based ExamsPartial CreditGroup Quizzes
“This class , and a final.”
MATH211
“ and around the same difficulty level.”
MATH102

Online

Online reviews mention tests, finals, study guides, textbook-based problems, and policy.

Tests And FinalStudy GuidesTextbook-Based ProblemsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“4 tests and a final.”
MATH215
“ so they weren't too bad.”
MATH215

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“He can be hard to hear at times and , but his humor and care for students outweigh the negatives.”

⚖️

62/100

“He's generous with partial credit, rewards effort, and worked with .”

📚 Workload Pressure

32/100

“This class , and a final.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and he clearly cares about the subject.
  • and involve him going page by page in the book doing example problems not explaining any of the why.
  • He is very soft spoken and has an accent so it is hard to understand him sometimes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He is very lenient with grading and .
  • very hard to pass the class if you can't understand the professor.
  • and sometimes gives .

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • The transition online was obviously not the easiest for him.
  • This professor is suited for in a classroom setting, not online learning.
  • Calc 211 is a mess online.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

77

Lifetime ratings

98/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years and both formats provide rich, consistent evidence of a polarized experience.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 516
3 out of 513
2 out of 59
1 out of 513

Course coverage

MATH21110 reviews
MATH0707 reviews
MATH1027 reviews
MATH0834 reviews
MATH1044 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH2154 reviews
MATH1003 reviews
MATH703 reviews
MATH0582 reviews
MATH1032 reviews
139771 review
CALC2111 review
MATH0601 review
MATH1301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 2 · A 12 · A- 2

B range

11

B+ 3 · B 7 · B- 1

C range

2

C- 2

D range

2

D+ 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2