AI Rate Professor

Physics

Brett Clark

PHYSIC220 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
65%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Take Brett Clark if you want a strong lecturer and can handle fast-paced physics with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAmazing lecturesGreat feedbackFast pacedLenient gradingChallenging exams
  • Most students praise Clark as , and .
  • Physics remains challenging, and lectures can move fast or feel above the textbook level.
  • as lenient, with , and feedback.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

Good grades are realistic because of , and lenient grading, but .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Physics content is demanding, fast-paced, and sometimes taught above the textbook level.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Attendance is not clearly described as mandatory, but missing .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend him for , and fair grading despite the challenge.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Students frequently mention partial credit, , and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, but , and outside study add meaningful effort.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most reviews , and helpfulness, though a few describe confusion or disengagement.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Students , and partial credit.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All evidence is in person, where students describe a challenging but often rewarding physics class with strong lectures and .

Main concern

Fast lectures and .

What students said

“Lecture is always engaging and clear.”
PHYSIC-220
“ but fair.”
PHYSIC-220

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are challenging but fair, with strong prep support and , and reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Challenging ExamsShort TestsPartial CreditExam Prep SessionsPossible Curves

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

sessions, partial credit, and some curves, but no clear closed-book policy is proven.

Challenging ExamsShort TestsPartial CreditExam Prep Sessions
“ and gives A LOT of partial credit.”
PHYSIC-220
“ but fair.”
PHYSIC-220

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Clark is one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Lecture is always engaging and clear.”

⚖️

75/100

“He grades based on how you understood the concept, and not so much if you get the right answer which is AMAZING”

📚 Difficulty Level

34/100

“Be prepared to work hard, but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is an OUTSTANDING lecturer
  • He is a very good lecturer and .
  • lectures where really fast but thats it.

Theme 2

🧪

  • but fair.
  • and to the the exam
  • The .

Theme 3

⚠️

  • If of physics on your own
  • It was tough to get relevant practice for exams
  • Otherwise, stay away!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 20 recent in-person reviews are detailed and , and grading.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PHYSIC-22020 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 3

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 5

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 2