AI Rate Professor

Biology

Adam Welday

BIO100 · BIO107 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
9/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

unless you have no other option and , and unclear preparation.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized teachingVery test heavyHeavy readingHarsh experienceSome extra credit
  • Most students strongly warn against taking him because , and course organization are poor.
  • The course is intellectually demanding mainly because students feel and late materials.
  • Some , but this does not offset the repeated teaching complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is possible with self-study and , but most comments , and poor preparation.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The biology content becomes challenging because , and students feel forced to teach themselves.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

and lecture is not, while other comments emphasize participation and in-class labs without a consistent policy.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

14/100

because they describe disorganization, weak teaching, late materials, and .

All because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Many tags call him a tough grader, though a minority of reviews mention and lenient late work or lab and .

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

Students repeatedly mention heavy , and test-heavy expectations.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Most reviews say he is unorganized, well, posts materials late, and does not prepare students for assessments.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

The course is described as , and , but exams and quizzes dominate student concern.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews overwhelmingly describe poor , and high stress.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say he does not teach effectively and leaves them underprepared for exams and quizzes.

What students said

“The far.”
Bio100
“He does not prepare you for .”
Bio107

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are high-risk because students report poor preparation, difficult exams, and late study materials, but closed-book or .

Test HeavyMultiple QuizzesDifficult ExamsLate Study Guides

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and late study guides, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring.

Test HeavyMultiple QuizzesDifficult ExamsLate Study Guides
“The and he does not post lectures or the study guide until a few days before.”
Bio107
“ and multiple quizzes in a single class.”
Bio107

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nice guy but not a good teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendations. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“He can not teach.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

14/100

“Please stay away from him even if he's your last option.”

📚 Workload Pressure

16/100

“1 to 2 days to read a chapter that will have a quiz.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are not very informative.
  • He does not prepare you for .
  • He is very unprepared, sets the students up for failure.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • .
  • He expect understand things at a neuroscience level.
  • He but .

Theme 3

🚫 About Student Warnings

  • .
  • Don't even bother
  • Find a different professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 16 recent in-person reviews are detailed, consistent, and strongly negative across multiple courses.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 513

Course coverage

Bio10714 reviews
Bio1002 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

12

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 10