AI Rate Professor

English

Lorrie Wood

ENG103 · ENG101 · 107 lifetime ratings

AI rating
98/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
93.33%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with weekly reading and writing.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFair gradingExtra credit supportReading and writing heavyCaring instructorWell organized
  • Students overwhelmingly recommend her because the class is organized, fair, and useful for writing growth.
  • The course requires steady weekly reading and writing, but students repeatedly say it is manageable.
  • , and supportive communication make high grades very reachable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

High grades are common, but students still , and participation work.

Online evidence strongly supports and manageable work, while in-person evidence shows similar outcomes with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The and organized, though the reading, writing, and critical thinking keep it from being effortless.

Both formats describe manageable English work, with online reviews giving more detail about weekly structure.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters appears often, so engagement is important even though .

Both formats emphasize participation, but neither clearly proves a .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students recommend her because , and helps them become stronger writers.

Online and evidence more numerous.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

Students repeatedly mention fair grading, , and many A-range outcomes.

Format shift

Online reviews strongly mention and fair grading, while in-person reviews are positive but .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload is steady and reading-heavy, but students usually call it manageable and worthwhile.

Format shift

Online reviews describe weekly reading and writing in detail, while and writing demands.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Students consistently describe her as , and effective at improving writing.

Format shift

Both formats support excellent teaching, with online reviews providing much larger evidence volume.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews focus on essays, research projects, discussions, reading, writing, and .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions quizzes and essays, while and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are also very positive, with students praising her kindness, assignments, topics, and writing improvement.

Main concern

Students still need to read, write, and participate consistently.

What students said

“Love, and understanding.”
ENG101
“A lot of reading and writing.”
ENG101
“I learned a lot and feel like I'm a better writer now.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are highly positive, emphasizing , and strong preparation for later writing courses.

Main concern

There is a steady amount of reading, writing, and participation each week.

What students said

“ and was easy to complete each week's work.”
ENG101
“This class does have a lot of reading and writing but is fairly graded.”
ENG101
“The saved my grade this semester.”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The , while broader exam and proctoring policies are not clearly proven.

Open Notes QuizzesEssay Based WorkExam policy mostly not proven

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention open-notes quizzes, but do not clearly prove .

Open Notes Quizzes
“The and manageable.”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class does have a lot of reading and writing but is fairly graded.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 , and format patterns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“The class helped me become a better writer.”

👍 Recommendation Level

95/100

“A wonderful class and professor.”

⚖️

84/100

“A great class with .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She cares about her students and helped me during a tough time to get through the class.
  • A great instructor with so much empathy in my personal issues.
  • Love, and understanding.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • A lot of work but .
  • It is important to complete the work on time and each week.
  • There is quite a bit of reading, but it all ties into the essays.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • The saved my grade this semester.
  • If you are struggling, there is available.
  • The and the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

107

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across both formats are recent, detailed, and highly consistent.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 583
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 511
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ENG10147 reviews
ENG1033 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

50 reported outcomes

A range

38

A+ 18 · A 7 · A- 13

B range

12

B+ 11 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values