AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Guatam Dhar

CHEM151 · CHEM202 · CHEM201 · CHEM50097 · CHEM102 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
23.53%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can learn chemistry mostly on your own and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understandStrict graderTest heavyUnclear lecturesHigh self-study burden
  • Most students say and difficult to follow.
  • Exams and as strict or very difficult.
  • A minority says he is knowledgeable and can help students who already have chemistry experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some students earn As through curves or practice exams, but most comments , and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Chemistry content becomes much harder because students say and exams are difficult.

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, but many students say lectures still do not help much.

Only in-person reviews mention attendance, including comments that skipping class hurts but lectures are weak.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

because , and poor at answering questions.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students frequently report tough grading, point loss for small mistakes, and .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students , and outside learning.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most reviews say he knows chemistry but , and gives unhelpful answers.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

84/100

Grades appear , and reports.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and heavy reliance on textbooks or self-study.

Main concern

Students often feel underprepared for exams and .

What students said

“Does not prepare you for the ”
CHEM202
“He grades very strictly, sometimes giving zero credit for a small mistake.”
CHEM202

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students repeatedly , and limited preparation, even though some exams follow worksheets or practice exams.

Difficult ExamsStrict GradingPractice Exam GuidanceQuizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and strict grading, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Difficult ExamsStrict GradingPractice ExamsQuizzes
“the because they closely follow worksheets”
CHEM202
“ .”
CHEM201

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's absolutely brilliant, but clearly not meant for teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“He knows a lot but doesn't know how to teach .”

⚖️

25/100

“ and lab reports for the smallest details.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

20/100

“Avoid if you can”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and unorganized.
  • .
  • Knows exactly what he is talking about but his accent is very hard to understand.

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams And Grades

  • Class averages in most of the .
  • .
  • If you complete/understand the .

Theme 3

📚

  • Ignore him and read the textbook.
  • Most of the learning will be done outside of !
  • Read the book and study a lot if you want to pass the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one detailed reviews over many years show strong consistency, though a few positive reviews create some variation.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 510

Course coverage

CHEM1519 reviews
CHEM2015 reviews
CHEM2025 reviews
CHEM1021 review
CHEM500971 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 4

B range

5

B 5

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 1