AI Rate Professor

English

Naomi Tarle

ART124A · ENGLISH103 · ENGL103 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · ART237 · ENGL110 · ENG96 · ENG103 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
85%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take Tarle if you want a , but be aware that a few students disliked her topic focus and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and supportiveClear feedbackEasy writing workloadBeginner friendlyOccasional belief-based conflict
  • Most students describe Tarle as , and .
  • Grades are usually easy if students complete the , and .
  • A small minority report unclear or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Most A reports come from completing clear essays or art assignments, with several students calling the class easy and manageable.

Online evidence is more mixed, while and clearly graded.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The content is usually introductory and clearly explained, though printmaking projects and .

In-person art and English reviews emphasize beginner support, while and essays but manageable pacing.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Attendance or participation matters in several reviews, but students mainly describe it as .

In-person reviews mention participation and showing up more often, while online reviews do not show a .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her because , and .

, while online recommendations remain positive overall but include sharper negative outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students often earned A grades and , and grading based on directions rather than talent.

Format shift

, while online grading has a few complaints about belief-based standards.

Workload

Light

80/100

Work is usually spread out and manageable, with a few essays, readings, drawing assignments, or .

Format shift

and papers, while in-person classes are often described as simple with enough time to finish.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Most comments praise her as caring, funny, knowledgeable, clear, and .

Format shift

, while online teaching is good overall but includes complaints about vague responses.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Grades appear centered on essays, art projects, assignments, reading, participation, and .

Format shift

Both formats rely mostly on papers or format.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive, especially for , and beginner-friendly art instruction.

Main concern

One in-person review reports discomfort and difficulty hearing demonstrations, but this is not the dominant pattern.

What students said

“Easiest class I have ever taken.”
ENGL101
“Professor Tarle explained and/or demonstrated everything that we had to do”
ART237
“Always felt like I was walking on eggshells with her.”
ART124A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive for , and manageable papers, but two students report vague help or .

Main concern

Some online students felt grading or help depended too much on topic alignment and vague communication.

What students said

“Her class was great and paced excellently!”
ENG103
“Easy A if you have similar beliefs as her.”
ENG101
“I didn't find her as a good resource.”
ENG103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and assessment appears mostly assignment-based.

No Written Final MentionedAssignment-Based GradingExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and no written final in one art class, but do not clearly prove a broader exam policy.

No Written Final MentionedEssaysProjects
“Only a and quizzes. .”
ART124A

Online

Online reviews mention essays, summaries, discussions, reading, and a final, but do not clearly .

EssaysDiscussionsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“10 summaries, 10 discussion, 10 group discussion, 4 essays+final.”
ENG103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easiest class I have ever taken.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Naomi is super sweet and knowledgeable.”

📈 Easy A Potential

88/100

“ .”

⚠️ Mixed Online Fit

90/100

“Easy A if you have similar beliefs as her.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and funny.
  • and is lenient of late work.
  • Naomi is super sweet and knowledgeable.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easiest class I have ever taken.
  • .
  • It is more than enough time.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • .
  • .
  • Always felt like I was walking on eggshells with her.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 21 reviews span many years, include both formats, and show a consistent positive pattern with a .

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART2375 reviews
ENG1034 reviews
ART124A3 reviews
ENG1013 reviews
ENGL1012 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENG961 review
ENGL1031 review
ENGL1101 review
ENGLISH1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 2 · A 12

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2