AI Rate Professor

Not Specified

Janet English

CIT156 · CAWT140 · CIT140 · CIT105 · CIT166 · CIT082 · CIT086 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
15.38%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless , and keep up with many assignments.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnhelpful teachingStrict SAM gradingHeavy homeworkRude toneSelf-teaching needed
  • Recent reviews are strongly negative and repeatedly say English is rude, unhelpful, and unclear.
  • Many students still report A grades, but they often credit self-teaching, classmates, books, or online tutorials rather than instruction.
  • Workload and SAM grading are frequent pain points, especially because strict rules and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students earned A grades, but comments suggest the A often comes from self-teaching and .

The single online review calls the class easy if homework is on time, while and heavy work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

61/100

The software content can be manageable or easy for tech-savvy students, but and SAM complexity make it harder than expected.

Online evidence says the material is useful and easy with timely work, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Reviews emphasize strict , and needing class if students are not already comfortable with computers.

Online evidence specifically says no extensions, while and work often completed in class.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most because they describe rude behavior, weak teaching, and excessive assignments.

The one online review is negative, and the recent years.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and no extensions make grading feel unforgiving despite many reported A grades.

Format shift

Online evidence directly mentions strict SAM grading, while and strict expectations.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and SAM workload.

Format shift

Online evidence says there is so , and in-person evidence repeatedly reports lengthy work and many assignments.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Recent comments repeatedly say she does not teach clearly, dismisses questions, and leaves students confused.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is limited, while instruction and unhelpfulness.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews , and tests, suggesting a mix of assignments and exams.

Format shift

Online evidence centers on SAM assignments, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews mostly criticize rude interactions, weak , and reliance on self-teaching.

Main concern

Students often feel dismissed when asking for help and say they must learn from outside resources.

What students said

“Doesn't teach anything.”
CAWT140
“so rude to you if you have any questions”
CAWT140
“just go to YouTube and learn all the Microsoft Office programs yourself”
CAWT140

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review says the class can be easy if , but , and no extensions.

Main concern

Strict SAM grading and .

What students said

“ !!!”
CAWT140
“This professor uses SAM which is a .”
CAWT140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams and , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, take-home, or .

SAM AssignmentsExamsStrict Grading SystemNo Extensions

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, quiz format, midterm format, or .

ExamsTest HeavyStrict Rules
“ , and .”
CAWT140
“The and drags on and on.”
CIT082

Online

The online review supports strict SAM grading and no extensions, but reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown .

Strict SAM GradingNo Extensions
“ !!!”
CAWT140
“SAM which is a ”
CAWT140

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Doesn't teach anything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student treatment. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Doesn't teach anything.”

👍 Recommendation Level

22/100

“AVOID IF YOU CAN”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“The and drags on and on.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't speak in a way lots of people could understand.
  • Professor English was generally an unhelpful professor.
  • She does half an and tells you to figure it out.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • While the class was easy if you do the so .
  • This professor uses SAM which is a .
  • Be ready to work.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • so rude to you if you have any questions
  • When you asked her for help, she dismissed you
  • She was so rude to her students and has very strict rules that we had to follow.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 18 reviews over a long time span, with a strong recent pattern of detailed negative comments and one online review.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 59

Course coverage

CAWT14010 reviews
CIT1402 reviews
CIT1562 reviews
CIT0821 review
CIT0861 review
Show 2 more courses
CIT1051 review
CIT1661 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 6 · A 8

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1