AI Rate Professor

Hospitality

Lee Corkett

REC122 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Corkett looks like a strong choice for students who want a patient and personable instructor, but the evidence base is very small.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyFun InstructorPatientApproachableCaringBeginner Friendly
  • The single review describes Corkett as fun, patient, and easy to talk to.
  • The course appears approachable and not very difficult based on the grade and difficulty rating.
  • Evidence is very limited because .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

The A grade and low difficulty suggest the course is not hard to do well in, but one review is not enough to prove a free A.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The course appears accessible because the instructor is patient and easy to talk to, with a low difficulty rating.

All course easiness evidence comes from one in-person REC-122 review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does not clearly .

Only one in-person review exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

The student is highly enthusiastic because , and approachable.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

The A grade and low difficulty suggest lenient or , but the .

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists, and it .

Workload

Light

76/100

The course seems light from the low difficulty rating, but the review .

Format shift

All workload evidence is indirect and comes from one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

The student strongly praises Corkett as fun, patient, and easy to talk with.

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not mention exams, assignments, projects, or mix.

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists, and it gives no assessment details.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The in-person review is highly positive and emphasizes a .

Main concern

Only one review exists, so conclusions are not very stable.

What students said

“Lee was so fun teaching backpacking to us all.”
REC-122
“He was so patient and very easy to talk with about anything.”
REC-122

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book rules, quizzes, midterms, or finals.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Lee was so fun teaching backpacking to us all. He was so patient and very easy to talk with about anything. Love him!”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting teaching style and approachability. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“Lee was so fun teaching backpacking to us all.”

❤️ Approachability

90/100

“He was so patient and very easy to talk with about anything.”

📈 Course Ease

80/100

“Love him!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lee was so fun teaching backpacking to us all.
  • He was so patient and very easy to talk with about anything.
  • Love him!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, so the positive signal is useful but not enough for high confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

REC-1221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values