AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Allison Evans

PSHCH109 · PSYCH101 · PSYCH109 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take Evans if you can handle reading and mixed lecture quality, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardMixed Teaching ExperienceClear RubricsReading HeavyHelpful FeedbackExam Dependent
  • Online reviews range from very difficult to super easy, but .
  • teaching and fast, unfocused lectures.
  • Grades can be strong when students follow the rules, but exams and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

An A is realistic if students keep up with , and course rules, but it is not effortless for everyone.

Online evidence shows clearer paths to a good grade, while and lecture fit.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The material can feel simple with clear rubrics, but , and .

Online students describe structure and ease, while and self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

In-person tags repeatedly warn that skipping class hurts performance, while .

; online reviews do not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Students recommend her when the course is structured and , but negative reviews warn strongly about difficulty and lecture quality.

Online reviews are moderately positive overall, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Clear rubrics and feedback help, but tough grader tags and .

Format shift

Online grading appears clearer, while .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Several students mention lots of , though one online student says the workload was not too much.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework and reading most clearly, while and studying.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Students describe her as caring and entertaining, but others say lectures are unstable, fast, or require self-teaching.

Format shift

Online comments emphasize structure and responsiveness, while and confusing delivery.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Reviews mention essays, homework, quizzes, readings, and .

Format shift

Online evidence points to homework and rubrics, while and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are polarized, with some students praising her kindness and others , and self-teaching.

Main concern

The main risk is needing to teach yourself when lectures feel unfocused.

What students said

“Be prepared to teach yourself.”
PSHCH109
“The course work was very simple and the of the material.”
PSHCH109

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed but lean manageable when students keep up with , and .

Main concern

The and .

What students said

“This course has a lot of homework and , but if you meet all the conditions, it is easy to get a good grade in this course.”
psych101
“It was super easy.”
psych101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and quiz risk, but they do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring policies.

Exam HeavyPop QuizzesRules Not Fully Clear

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Exam HeavyPop Quizzes
“Sixty percent of the class grade is dependent on the exams.”
PSHCH109
“she does give some ”
PSYCH109

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This course has a lot of homework and , but if you meet all the conditions, it is easy to get a good grade in this course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She was so sweet and thoughtful in her lectures and always allowed room for students to provide their own input.”

📈 Grade Path

65/100

“if you meet all the conditions, it is easy to get a good grade in this course.”

⚠️ Main Risk

45/100

“Be prepared to teach yourself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was so sweet and thoughtful in her lectures and always allowed room for students to provide their own input.
  • She's entertaining and talks about herself a lot.
  • her lectures are very easy and understandable

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Just dont do it. Very Difficult.
  • This course has a lot of homework and
  • Not too much homework at all considering I took a short class.

Theme 3

📝 About Grades

  • .
  • Sixty percent of the class grade is dependent on the exams.
  • she does give some

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across several years give useful but polarized evidence, with and some older comments.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

psych1013 reviews
PSHCH1092 reviews
PSYCH1092 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1