AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ingrid Barbullushi

MATH212 · MATH19392 · MATH211 · MATH102104 · MATH102 · MATH58 · MATH70 · MATH070 · MATH058 · MATH060 · MATH100 · MATH104 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
91.67%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take Barbullushi if you want a supportive math professor and are and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring math supportLots of homeworkTest heavyClear resourcesFair but demanding
  • Most students describe Barbullushi as caring, available, and strong at helping students understand math.
  • The courses , and attendance.
  • Grading is usually fair with partial credit or , but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Good grades are , and use support, but the A is earned through steady work.

Online has some more student-friendly exam evidence, while and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Standard

47/100

The math content is not inherently easy, especially calculus and accelerated courses, but his notes and resources make it manageable.

Online resources make the content feel more manageable, while , and difficult tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

as formally mandatory, but many students say lectures and notes are essential for passing exams.

In-person reviews strongly tie attendance to success, while online , and pacing resources.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Most students recommend him because , and fair despite the workload.

Recommendation is strong in both formats, though .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

Students mention , and , but also tough or picky exam grading.

Format shift

Online reviews include open-note exams and , while and occasional tough grading.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and frequent math practice.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy work, but online reviews offset it with recordings and notes while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most students describe him as , and committed to helping students succeed.

Format shift

Online reviews praise resources and prepared lectures, while but include a few complaints about textbook-heavy teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Assessment is strongly , and occasional projects.

Format shift

and finals, while online reviews mention homework, tests, quizzes, worksheets, and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and helpful, but many say homework, attendance, and tests are demanding.

Main concern

Tests and , and some students dislike his textbook-based teaching style.

What students said

“There is a lot of homework but he's an and .”
MATH212
“The and I do not think he did a good job preparing us.”
MATH211

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students praise , and student-friendly open-note testing in one course, but still report heavy work.

Main concern

Online math courses can demand a lot of homework and self-paced effort.

What students said

“ and are taken in a 4 hour timeframe.”
MATH212
“His classes demand a lot of work.”
MATH070

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are central and sometimes hard, but reviews often mention clear reviews, partial credit, , and some open-note online testing.

Test HeavyFinal Can Replace Lowest TestOpen Note Online EvidencePartial CreditReview Problems

Assessment risk

Standard

66/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe test-heavy courses with finals, reviews, partial credit, and notes-based exams, but do not clearly prove closed-book or .

Test HeavyFinal ExamPartial CreditReview ProblemsNotes-Based Exams
“4 tests and a final exam. .”
MATH212
“The !”
MATH070

Online

and tests in one course, but does not clearly prove webcam or proctoring policies.

Open Note QuizzesOpen Note TestsFour Hour Test WindowReview Materials
“ and are given the whole lecture period to complete and and are taken in a 4 hour timeframe.”
MATH212
“ ”
MATH100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're willing to put in the work he's willing to help you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“He truly cares for his students, and he is not afraid to have fun with us”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“Be prepared to do a lot of homework!”

🧪

66/100

“4 tests and a final exam. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and well prepared.
  • will not be lost, and if you don't understand he will explain it in a different way until you do.
  • His teaching style is reading the words from the textbook verbatim and just tracing practice problems so you might as well teach yourself.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • There is a lot of homework but he's an and .
  • but he gives lots of partial credit.
  • Do the work and show some effort and you'll pass his class with ease.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • He tells you what to expect for the test.
  • so just practice those and a and you'll do great!
  • Gives you all the exact problems that and final, so you can study more effectively.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 36 reviews across many years and courses with rich, repeated , and grading.

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH2127 reviews
MATH0706 reviews
MATH1004 reviews
MATH1024 reviews
MATH1043 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH2113 reviews
MATH1021042 reviews
MATH582 reviews
MATH702 reviews
MATH0581 review
MATH0601 review
MATH193921 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 6 · A 7

B range

15

B+ 6 · B 9

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1