AI Rate Professor

English

Heather MacLean

ESL80 · ESL091 · ESL080 · ENG101 · ESL8876 · ENG100 · ESL100 · ESLLOL · 87 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want active support and feedback, but expect to participate and keep up with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring supportStrong feedbackWork-heavy ESLParticipation mattersMixed organization
  • Most students describe her as caring, funny, helpful, and .
  • Grades can be very achievable, especially with participation, rewrites, and completed assignments.
  • A minority report heavy homework, tough grading, slow feedback, or poor organization, especially in online or older reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Grades , and completed assignments, but lazy students get punished by the workload.

grades, while online evidence is too mixed to call consistently easy.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

Many students call the class easy to understand, but ESL and English writing work can still be demanding.

, while the few online reviews split between easy support and heavy disorganization.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Participation and are not consistently described.

Online reviews mention Zoom groups and participation, while and on-time work to success.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend her because , and .

, while online reviews include one extreme warning that lowers confidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

63/100

She can grade tough, but , and clear effort often help students improve grades.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide strong evidence of rewrites and feedback, while online reviews .

Workload

Moderate

47/100

The workload ranges from manageable to heavy, with repeated mentions of , and active class work.

Format shift

Online evidence is mixed but includes a , while in-person reviews more consistently frame the work as demanding but useful.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most comments praise her care, humor, patience, and feedback, though some students report disorganization or poor responsiveness.

Format shift

, while online comments are more polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

24/100

Assessment appears centered on writing assignments, essays, homework, rewrites, participation, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and participation, and reviews do not provide clear evidence of .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and class energy, while some warn that the work can be demanding.

Main concern

Students .

What students said

“As long as you attend and .”
ENG100
“ as many times as we need to improve the grades.”
ESL100
“If . You will be crazy.”
ESL100

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are polarized, with two very positive comments and one , and workload.

Main concern

Online organization and workload may vary sharply by class.

What students said

“ really go out of her way for you”
ESL091
“Professor was kind and funny.”
ESLLOL
“RUN AWAY AS FAST AS YOU CAN!!!! She never organizes the class”
ESL100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and participation, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, open-book, midterm, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam FormatWriting AssignmentsEssaysParticipation Work

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and occasional quizzes, but do not clearly prove exam format or proctoring rules.

EssaysRewritesAssignmentsKahoot Reviews
“and two to three essay per semester 2000 words.”
ENG100
“we can rewrite things as many times as we need to improve the grades.”
ESL100
“ .”
ESL100

Online

Online reviews mention Zoom groups and homework, but do not clearly prove webcam exams, .

Zoom Group WorkHomework Heavy Mention
“ .”
ESLLOL
“A LOT OF HOME WORKS MORE THAN YOU THINK”
ESL100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I got an A in Heather's class. Heather is incredibly cool and makes ESL fun. BUT! THIS IS NOT A CLASS FOR SLACKERS!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ really go out of her way for you”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“I cannot say enough good things about Heather she is the so much and genuinely enjoy the class, TAKE HER.”

⚖️

63/100

“Grades a little hard but lets you rewrite for a better grade.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support

  • really go out of her way for you
  • she works really hard to get all students to understand..
  • She makes every effort for all students to do well.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Effort

  • As long as you attend and .
  • as many times as we need to improve the grades.
  • THIS IS NOT A CLASS FOR SLACKERS!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Workload & Organization

  • She has a good personality and always she looks like happy but she .
  • RUN AWAY AS FAST AS YOU CAN!!!! She never organizes the class
  • I felt completely ignored in the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

87

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across a long time span provide rich detail, though opinions vary more sharply by format and course period.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 550
4 out of 511
3 out of 56
2 out of 59
1 out of 511

Course coverage

ESL10028 reviews
ENG1006 reviews
ESL0916 reviews
ESL0804 reviews
ESL802 reviews
Show 4 more courses
110221 review
ENG1011 review
ESL88761 review
ESLLOL1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 4 · A 16

B range

17

B+ 3 · B 14

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1