AI Rate Professor

Art

Mercedes McDonald

ART124A · ART101 · ART124 · ART140 · DRAW1 · ILLUSIDK · ART123 · ART222 · LANDMARKS · ART205 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
31.25%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want demanding art training and , and unclear expectations.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDemanding WorkloadTough GraderUnclear InstructionsHelpful FeedbackSerious Art Students
  • serious art students may learn a lot, but and harsh interactions.
  • The workload is often heavy, especially in illustration, with repeated , and strict standards.
  • Getting a good grade is possible if students follow her exact preferences, but the effort and stress are high.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible for students who follow detailed instructions, but , and high stress.

The online review is positive but tough, while effort and grading risk.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The content and projects are demanding because , and workload is high.

Online evidence is too limited, while and drawing as challenging.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and grade consequences for absences.

The ; the lone online review does not clearly prove attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is low because many students report , and overwhelming workload despite some strong learning outcomes.

The single online review recommends her, but the and often negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students often call her a , though some say following directions can lead to an A.

Format shift

, while the lone online review is positive but still says she is tough.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Multiple reviews describe lots of homework, 40 thumbnails per piece, expensive supplies, and very high weekly time demands.

Format shift

Heavy workload evidence is overwhelmingly in-person, with the online review only saying she pushes students hard.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

She can give useful art direction, but , and harsh communication.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is positive but thin, while and mixed to negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Grades appear driven mainly by projects, thumbnails, drawings, materials, and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

, but in-person reviews provide nearly all detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a but whose workload and communication often frustrate students.

Main concern

Students often , and very heavy workload.

What students said

“incredibly specific wants but incredibly vague instructions”
ART222
“The , and the workload was so intense literally 1/3 of the class dropped.”
ART222
“Illustration. AMAZING CLASS. Very hard, but I learned more in this class than all my previous art classes combined.”
ART222

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review is positive but still describes a tough, high-expectation course.

Main concern

The online evidence is too limited .

What students said

“She is tuff and will push you in all the right directions in order to help you succeed and progress.”
ART222
“This professor gives great direction to your ideas in order to create a great composition.”
ART222

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove any in-person exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove any online exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Illustration. AMAZING CLASS. Very hard, but I learned more in this class than all my previous art classes combined.”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

28/100

“incredibly specific wants but incredibly vague instructions”

📚 Workload Load

18/100

“The , and the workload was so intense literally 1/3 of the class dropped.”

🎯 Teaching Value

42/100

“Illustration. AMAZING CLASS. Very hard, but I learned more in this class than all my previous art classes combined.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

35/100

“ ”

Theme 1

🎨 About Learning Value

  • Illustration. AMAZING CLASS. Very hard, but I learned more in this class than all my previous art classes combined.
  • A lot of the things she teaches are very helpful once you get to the end.
  • This professor gives great direction to your ideas in order to create a great composition.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • As long as you do the work and follow directions, she will like you and you can pass.
  • You have to be no absent no late for her class.
  • Awesome teacher easy to get an A if and

Theme 3

⚠️ About Workload And Expectations

  • Told us we had to commit 40hrs/ .
  • you need to do 40 thumbnails per piece.
  • The , and the workload was so intense literally 1/3 of the class dropped.

Theme 4

🗣️ About Communication

  • .
  • and sometimes seems, she has a

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 33 reviews span many years with detailed and recurring themes, though course era and sentiment vary.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ART22214 reviews
ART124A7 reviews
ART1242 reviews
ART2052 reviews
DRAW12 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ILLUSIDK2 reviews
ART1011 review
ART1231 review
ART1401 review
LANDMARKS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1