AI Rate Professor

Paralegal Studies

Matthew Rungaitis

CONTRACTS106 · PARLG111 · PARLGL106 · BUS201 · REAL100 · PARLGL112 · PARLGL104 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
93.33%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want an engaging , and steady effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardReal-World ExamplesExtra CreditClear GradingEngaging LecturesFair but Demanding
  • Students strongly recommend him because he makes law topics practical, funny, and easier to understand.
  • Grades are usually fair with , but students still need to attend, read, and keep up.
  • Online reviews are more mixed because of response delays and lecture-heavy structure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Many students report , and , but the A still depends on showing up and doing the reading.

, while online reviews are more mixed because of delays and heavier reading.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Law concepts can be difficult, but his examples and lectures make the .

, while online reviews describe more lecture and reading burden.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but several reviews say lectures are essential for passing and doing well.

, while online evidence is limited and mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students recommend him because he is engaging, experienced, fair, and .

In-person reviews are highly enthusiastic, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students repeatedly mention fair , and .

Format shift

In-person reviews give the strongest evidence of leniency, while online reviews still include one positive and .

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload includes reading, quizzes, discussions, and homework, but students usually call it manageable and useful.

Format shift

Online reviews mention more reading and lecture heaviness, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students consistently praise his real-world legal experience, entertaining lectures, and willingness to help.

Format shift

In-person teaching reviews are excellent, while online teaching is positive but less consistent.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Grades appear , and occasional rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Both formats mention online homework or .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students overwhelmingly praise his lectures, examples, fairness, and opportunities.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“Easy A if you show up!”
BUS201
“He gives a lot of ”
PARLGL106

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, with praise for useful work and but concern about delays and lecture-heavy delivery.

Main concern

Response delays and .

What students said

“There is no busy work, just what you really need to learn.”
PARLG111
“expects delays in response”
PARLG111

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are usually online or multiple choice, with some tricky or and .

Online TestsMultiple Choice TestsTimed FinalExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and timed midterm or final requirements, but not proctoring rules.

Online TestsMultiple Choice TestsTimed Midterm and Final
“ and and timed for a minute per questions.”
PARLGL106
“ choice homework and easy discussion board once weekly, all online.”
BUS201

Online

Online reviews do not clearly .

Unclear ProctoringReading Required
“You do have to read a lot from the textbook to understand the information.”
PARLG111

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He demands excellence, but is not a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He uses real life examples so that you can understand the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“ .”

⚖️

82/100

“He gives a lot of which can help with those who struggle with the quizzes and tests.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He brings his experience into the classroom, which make the class all the more enjoyable.
  • Lectures are good/entertaining, and he gives good examples to help remember concepts.
  • He uses real life examples so that you can understand the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if you show up!
  • He demands excellence, but is not a .
  • Several opportunities for .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • He genuinely cares about the success of his students and and advice.
  • and help his students grow.
  • Willing to make adjustments and accommodate to your needs.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen detailed reviews across formats and years show strong consistency in praise, with a .

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BUS2016 reviews
PARLGL1065 reviews
PARLG1112 reviews
CONTRACTS1061 review
PARLGL1041 review
Show 2 more courses
PARLGL1121 review
REAL1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1