AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Sanja Morris

PHIL101 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you are willing to read, attend, and follow directions closely, because the .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing teachingTough gradingReading requiredCaring when engagedParticipation matters
  • Student experiences and complaints about harsh or subjective grading.
  • Getting a , and following instructions closely.
  • Online reviews range from easy and and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly , and careful completion of assignments.

Online evidence is mixed between easy completion and strict zeroes, while but passable.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The philosophy content is not usually described as deeply hard, but , and expectations raise the challenge.

Online students describe structured tasks, while , and reading.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Attendance and participation appear important, especially for in-person success and missed work policies.

In-person reviews stress being in class, while online reviews stress activity tracking and assignment access.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students either strongly praise her care and passion or and teaching style.

Both formats are polarized, with online comments especially split between easy structure and harsh enforcement.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Several students call her a tough or , though .

Format shift

Online grading ranges from easy credit to zeroes, while and subjective.

Workload

Moderate

56/100

, and exams rather than constant busy work.

Format shift

Online workload can be light when instructions are followed, while and notes.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is polarized, with strong praise for care and passion balanced by complaints about boring or .

Format shift

Online praise focuses on clarity and kindness, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention quizzes, writing assignments, discussion posts, a , and tests.

Format shift

Online evidence clearly mentions quizzes, discussions, papers, midterm, and final; and writing assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with some students praising her passion and and lecture clarity.

Main concern

, and accept high expectations to do well.

What students said

“You have to be in class and pay attention and ”
PHIL101
“She grades based off of her own opinion.”
PHIL101

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split between easy structured work and strict enforcement of activity, missed work, and assignment expectations.

Main concern

Some and strict monitoring of course activity.

What students said

“She constantly checks when were you active and .”
PHIL101
“Do all of the assignments and you'll pass easily.”
PHIL101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, a midterm, a final, and simple tests, but .

Midterm and final examShort quizzesSimple tests reported by some students

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention tests that some students found simple, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or .

Simple tests
“ .”
PHIL101

Online

Online reviews mention a and final, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

5 question quizzesMidterm and final exam
“we got graded on a few 5 question quizzes”
PHIL101
“a mid term and ”
PHIL101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“While she is a and fun to learn from, she has high expectations for her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ , and ethically-driven!”

⚖️

35/100

“ to grade, grades of her own mood.”

📚 Effort Required

54/100

“if you want a good grade you have to do the and truly put effort into it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a great teacher!
  • Her lectures are just her talking the entire class and are very boring.
  • she made learning philosophy really intresting

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • Do all of the assignments and you'll pass easily.
  • Doesn't give a chance for correcting
  • If the board, and memorize the material you are guaranteed to pass.

Theme 3

💬 About Student Experience

  • The .
  • I truly enjoyed Professor Morris' class.
  • Sanja Morris was one of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across many years and both formats show a consistent polarization pattern with enough detail to judge tradeoffs.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PHIL1019 reviews
174031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1