AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

David Hendrickson

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a and fair expectations.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringFunnyHelpful feedbackRelaxed class vibeReal-world experience
  • Both reviews are extremely positive and .
  • Students describe him as caring, funny, relatable, and .
  • Assignments appear manageable when students show up and submit work on time.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Both students earned A-range grades and describe manageable expectations as long as .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

79/100

The classes sound approachable and comfortable, with enough work time and support to make the content manageable.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

72/100

and help, but reviews do not describe a strict penalty beyond needing to show up and work.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

because he is caring, helpful, funny, and makes class enjoyable.

All because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Grades and comments suggest fair, forgiving expectations as long as students complete assignments on time.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

Students say they had plenty of time to complete assignments and could work during class.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students praise , and real-world art experience.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Reviews focus on assignments, class work time, and turning work in, with .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

he gives time to work, helps students, and keeps expectations reasonable.

Main concern

The and turn work in on time.

What students said

“he's by far the .”
125
“Gave us lots of class time to work and helps you while you work.”
270

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly mention .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, open-book rules, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“David is amazing!! I took his fundamentals of drawing class, he's by far the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and class experience. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“He's really chill, funny, and actually cares about his students.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“Overall loved his class, very fun, :)”

🧰 In-Class Support

82/100

“Gave us lots of class time to work and helps you while you work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's really chill, funny, and actually cares about his students.
  • He makes you feel comfortable and is very relatable.

Theme 2

🖌️

  • You're given plenty of time to complete the in on time.
  • You can talk and have fun during class as long as you show up and get your work done.

Theme 3

❤️ About Class Experience

  • Overall loved his class, very fun, :)
  • I learned a lot about Art from him.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

46/100

Evidence confidence

, so the tone is very positive but the evidence base is small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

1251 review
2701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values