AI Rate Professor

English

John Albert

ENG10157004 · ENGL102 · ENGL103 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · ENGLISH · ENG103 · 121 lifetime ratings

AI rating
59/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
61.4%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if possible, but be cautious online because organization and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but inconsistentHeavy writingDisorganized onlineHelpful feedback variesManageable grading
  • him as caring, helpful, and easier to pass.
  • Online reviews are sharply mixed, with many complaints about unclear instructions, , and .
  • The class is usually passable with effort, but workload and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Many students earn A grades and say passing is manageable, but the writing load, organization issues, and .

In-person reviews more often call the class easy, while online reviews describe more workload and organization friction.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

The English content is usually not intellectually hard, but , and .

Online difficulty is driven more by disorganization, while and attendance.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Attendance and participation help a lot, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

In-person reviews emphasize showing up and participating, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

59/100

instructor, but many online students warn against his disorganization and weak communication.

Recommendation is stronger for in-person classes and much more divided for online classes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Grades are often good and some reviews call him generous, but others report tough, subjective, delayed, or .

Format shift

Online grading complaints are more frequent, while as fair or manageable.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

The , and periodic assignment spikes, with many students calling it a lot but doable.

Format shift

Online reviews report more inconsistent workload spikes, while as steady writing and reading.

Teaching experience

Average

61/100

He is often caring and helpful, but , and poor online communication significantly weaken the experience.

Format shift

In-person teaching is rated more positively, while online and response issues.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears , and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus on writing assignments, with and submission confusion.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly , and manageable if students attend and complete the writing.

Main concern

, boring lectures, or strict grading.

What students said

“Show up to class and you will pass! Do the essays and activities and you will get an A!”
ENG101
“Work is doable, what he wants .”
ENG103
“ , and gave ALOTTT of .”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly mixed, praising care and learning gains but often criticizing disorganization, , and .

Main concern

Online students often struggle with , and poor communication.

What students said

“Overall, this class isn't difficult. It's the poor organization that makes it hard.”
ENG101
“The , and you often have to sift through numerous posts just to find them.”
101
“The class is set up to ensure that you succeed and you are given more than enough time to complete the major essays and readings.”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mostly describe essays and assignments rather than exams, and they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Essay-Based CourseFew Or No Exams MentionedAssignment Focused

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews focus on essays, activities, journals, homework, and participation, and do not .

Essay-Based CourseJournals And ActivitiesNo Clear Exam Policy
“Do the essays and activities and you will get an A!”
ENG101
“There are , if .”
ENG103

Online

Online reviews focus on essays, assignments, discussion boards, and due-date issues, and do not clearly prove any webcam, .

Essay-Based CourseDiscussion BoardsNo Clear Exam Policy
“ .”
ENG101
“ .”
ENGL103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall, this class isn't difficult. It's the poor organization that makes it hard.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

61/100

“ and understanding. He will make sure that you pass the class with a C.”

👍 Recommendation Level

59/100

“Take English in person, and if you have to take it online take any class other than this one.”

📚 Workload Reality

46/100

“Some weeks you have 1 assignment and others you have 4 assignments plus an essay”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and understanding.
  • He provided and quickly answered emails and questions.
  • Never leaves review marks or is

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Show up to class and you will pass! Do the essays and activities and you will get an A!
  • This class was so unbelievably easy for me.
  • A ! But it helps in the long run.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Organization

  • Overall, this class isn't difficult. It's the poor organization that makes it hard.
  • Due dates and instructions were often unclear or different from the outline given to us.
  • it hard to do work on time

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

121

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across multiple years and both formats provide rich detail, though opinions are strongly split by experience and format.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 560
4 out of 525
3 out of 511
2 out of 59
1 out of 516

Course coverage

ENG10123 reviews
ENG10312 reviews
1016 reviews
ENGL1013 reviews
ENGL1033 reviews
Show 3 more courses
ENG101570041 review
ENGL1021 review
ENGLISH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

22

A+ 2 · A 17 · A- 3

B range

5

B 5

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

11

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 9