AI Rate Professor

Art

Anna Hahn

ART124A · ART124 · ART125A · ART140 · ART124B · ART224A · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
46.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you are comfortable with strict art requirements, costly supplies, frequent critique, and a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh gradingExpensive suppliesAttendance mattersBeginner riskDetailed requirements
  • Recent in-person reviews are much harsher than , and lack of preparation.
  • Students repeatedly warn that supplies can be expensive and .
  • Positive reviews say students can learn a lot if they follow instructions, do the work, and tolerate critique.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

A grades are possible, but many students say she grades harshly, requires exact compliance, and makes students work hard for results.

The lone online review suggests a manageable A, while and effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content can be beginner-oriented, but students without art background often find the assignments demanding and underprepared.

Online evidence is mildly positive, while and recent reviews describe the course as harder for beginners.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Reviews repeatedly say participation and class attendance matter, with comments warning that missing class can hurt success.

Attendance concerns come almost entirely from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendations are split because some students learned a lot, but many warn against , and discouraging instruction.

The only online review recommends her, while in-person reviews are mixed and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, though some say it is fair if instructions are followed exactly.

Format shift

and are much stricter than the single online review.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Reviews , and significant outside work, especially in recent in-person classes.

Format shift

Online workload is not described as too heavy, while as heavy or sleep-losing.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Teaching is polarized, with older praise for helpful instruction but recent complaints about condescension, monotone lectures, and weak preparation.

Format shift

The single online review is very positive, while and recent ones are mostly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

12/100

Assessment appears , and assignment requirements rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point to project and evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are polarized, with older praise for helpful beginner teaching but recent , and expensive supplies.

Main concern

Recent in-person , and high supply costs.

What students said

“grades incredibly harshly, barely prepares you for the hw in class and won't upload your grade till the last day.”
ART124A
“You will spend $200+ on art supplies.”
ART140
“Expect to do the work & put in some effort & you'll be fine.”
ART124A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is very positive but still notes material costs and required peer interaction.

Main concern

The only concern mentioned online is material cost and remembering peer comments.

What students said

“Professor Hahn was wonderful, the class is a little expensive in some of the materials needed but you can source them affordably easily enough.”
ART124A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exams, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, closed-book, midterm, or , and assessment appears project-based.

Project-Based CourseNo Clear Exam PolicyPortfolio Or Homework Focus

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

85/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and critiques, and do not clearly prove any exam, proctoring, open-book, closed-book, midterm, or final policy.

Project-Based CoursePortfolio Or Binder ReviewHomework Focus
“Hands out lots of an end of semester binder review.”
ART140
“Can get a head start on most HW in class.”
ART124A

Online

The online review mentions materials and peer interaction but does not clearly prove any exam, quiz, proctoring, .

No Clear Exam PolicyPeer Interaction
“The hardest part of the class for me was the interaction with other students.”
ART124A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“grades incredibly harshly, barely prepares you for the hw in class and won't upload your grade till the last day.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course costs. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“She teaches 124A as if everyone already knows how to draw”

⚖️

28/100

“she will drop hw grades by 30% for two mistakes.”

💰 Course Cost

30/100

“You will spend $200+ on art supplies.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She teaches 124A as if everyone already knows how to draw
  • Very amazing teacher. Makes you become a better drawer and les you do your work on how you feel.
  • Boring and monotone.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • perfect scores .
  • she will drop hw grades by 30% for two mistakes.
  • As long as you follow the instructions, do the work, and submit on time, you'll do fine in this class.

Theme 3

💸 About Cost And Supplies

  • You will spend $200+ on art supplies.
  • You are going to spend at least 300-400 on materials.
  • No textbook, about $100+ for supplies

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-six reviews over many years give broad evidence, but the professor's reputation changes sharply between older positive and recent negative reviews.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ART124A16 reviews
ART1244 reviews
ART1403 reviews
ART124B1 review
ART125A1 review
Show 1 more courses
ART224A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

11

A 10 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2