AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Lin Wilde

MOTIOGMD · GMD173 · MEA173 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take Lin Wilde if you want a and keeps grading manageable.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear feedbackChill classroomIndustry experienceHelpful instructorFun projects
  • Students consistently praise Lin Wilde for and a relaxed class environment.
  • Most in-person students report high grades with manageable effort, though some find the material tough or lectures slow.
  • The single online review is more mixed because .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Most students who report grades earned A or A+ with , and .

, while the one online review says effort is still needed and grading delays hurt redo chances.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The course is approachable because and helps beginners, but design and animation material can still be tough.

, while the online review found the projects boring rather than conceptually hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews do not clearly state an , though in-person comments suggest class participation is useful.

Neither online nor in-person reviews clearly .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students recommend him because , and .

, while the single online review is neutral because of and boring projects.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Grades look favorable, with several A grades, resubmissions, and mentioned.

Format shift

and high grades, while the online review mentions resubmissions but says slow grading limits them.

Workload

Light

78/100

Students describe the class as fun and manageable, with no repeated complaints about heavy workload.

Format shift

, while the online review complains more about boredom than workload volume.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students repeatedly describe him as , and knowledgeable from industry work.

Format shift

In-person teaching reviews are excellent, while the only online review is more lukewarm about course experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Reviews mostly discuss projects, work feedback, resubmissions, and .

Format shift

Both formats point mainly to project and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive, with students , and enjoyable projects.

Main concern

A few students say lectures can feel boring or the material can be tough.

What students said

“Extremely chill, while actually being a good instructor.”
GMD173
“His lectures are easy to follow, he's great at giving and .”
GMD173
“Came in knowing NOTHING as far as Adobe Ae.”
GMD173

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The and likely success with effort, but and boring projects.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Put in effort & you'll probably be fine.”
MOTIOGMD
“He offers resubmissions for higher grades, but so you have no time to redo them.”
MOTIOGMD

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Online

The online review does .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Extremely chill, while actually being a good instructor. Can keep a positive environment while still critiquing and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Extremely hands-on and helpful. and exciting way.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“Had Lin for 173 and he was really great! and super cool. I learned alot from him! !”

📈 Easy A Potential

86/100

“ - yes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are easy to follow, he's great at giving and .
  • Extremely hands-on and helpful. and exciting way.
  • He actually works in animation for a living, so he knows what he's talking about.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class is pretty tough though.
  • Put in effort & you'll probably be fine.
  • - yes.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and super cool.
  • he's very smart and friendly
  • He's super young, super smart, cute, funny, easygoing and very helpful.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 12 reviews span many years, show consistent praise, and and class style.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

GMD1739 reviews
MOTIOGMD2 reviews
MEA1731 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1